w00t! pr0n! except not.
Nov. 27th, 2004 06:23 pmAhhhh,
stellabelle so owns me. Yeah, she wrote another H/D fic and yeah, I'm so in love with it I have to pimp it in this most embarrassing fashion. Ahem.
Possibly this might have to do with the fact that it's called `I Have A Girlfriend, You Fucker!'. I think this and this alone could make me fall over from the sheer beauty of it all.
Also, after
the_leaky's unfortunate descent into angst, I so needed this, man. Besides, there are references to like, British things in it. Like... like Kensington. Oh, the love. As well as easy!Draco and rather-stupid-but-eager!Harry. The world really should work like this. I mean, it may not, but DAMMIT IT SHOULD. Actually, it -does-, doesn't it?
Possibly this might have to do with the fact that it's called `I Have A Girlfriend, You Fucker!'. I think this and this alone could make me fall over from the sheer beauty of it all.
Also, after
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 03:37 am (UTC)No, you're right that it happens all the time in real life, too bad it never happens in fic because everymen with their little annoying uncool flaws are not romance material, oh woe.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 03:49 am (UTC)The thing with Draco/Pansy that makes it less than interesting is that we know next to nothing about Pansy, Draco is really rather gay, and there's little narrative tension between them. There's no tension, no drama, no-- central burning issue. So basically, I'm saying that some things that are 'real' or common just aren't as interesting when put down on paper 'cause they're... not very dramatic.
Like... most people read to be entertained, which is why they read about two people in love/lust in the first place, right-- and not about two people going grocery shopping :>
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 03:53 am (UTC)The only thing D/P lacks is the super-duper powers of superhumanity.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 03:57 am (UTC)I was trying to talk about narrative structure and how one needs a central conflict to make a pairing have mass appeal-- some... drive. It also helps to fit into a larger cliche but that's mostly 'cause most writers/readers are inexperienced and have pre-existing expectations & desires. Both of these seem unrelated to any conscious desire to uber-glorify the characters-- I'd argue that the only cases where this would really be true would be instances of Mary Sues anyway. And most people's Pansy is as Mary Sue as they come, btw.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:03 am (UTC)Dark has mass appeal too, you know, as in cool. The reason why DE fic is so popular is mainly that. I'm sure there's people who are into it for less shiny reasons, but a lot of people go for that goth poseur thing.
mass appeal-- some... drive.
Mass appeal is not drive. Mass appeal mostly plays on the desire of the audience to escape reality.
Pansy is as Mary Sue as they come, btw.
Because all Mary Sues get described as pug-faced and called stupid cows by the main heroine...?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:10 am (UTC)Anyway.
Mass appeal mostly plays on the desire of the audience to escape reality.
I was talking about narrative design, the writer's end of things-- it's not about audience, I meant mass appeal for writers, meaning questions about the narrative structure and how a story's built and how it hangs together and what makes good conflict/drama/angst. This isn't about audience. Audience is an entirely different issue which doesn't explain why things do or don't get written, just whether or not they become popular. D/P is vaguely popular to the extent that it's written, which isn't very great.
Because all Mary Sues get described as pug-faced and called stupid cows by the main heroine...?
I meant, in this case, audience percepion of Pansy, not your perception or the 'IC' perception or JKR's intent-- I was talking about popularity of characters determining whether they get used, and in this case, Pansy is popular in fandom for whatever reason and is Mary Sued a lot, too. Is it IC? No, but most people don't care, thusly you can't use the argument 'but she's uncool' to explain why anyone avoids writing her, since they don't stop to see her as IC long enough to avoid her for that reason.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:26 am (UTC)Anyway. You're still talking fanon at me. I know very well that fanon Draco (!!!) and fanon Pansy exist. That was the whole point of my rant. :/ Saying that someone upgrades Pansy doesn't prove anything except that people feel compelled to upgrade her.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 03:58 am (UTC)Right, who thinks of Ron/Hermione in those terms? If you follow any discussion about the ship or the characters, you will find that Ron and Hermione are flawed but "just teenagers" and "their hearts are in the right place" and above all they are the good guys, and do cool amazing things with the hero. Draco and Pansy aren't cool. They don't do any cool amazing thing. They are lame, and pathetic, and represent, whether their author did it purposely or not, a jungian shadow to the main character and even the reader. They are the lame half of the everyman. Nobody cares about humanity because humanity, when not romanticised to some degree, is deeply uncool.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:05 am (UTC)However, you're right-- they're not cool. That's what I meant-- Ron & Hermione aren't 'cool' but they're -made- cool because that's how the fandom wants to see them (ie, bias, yeay!) and because their dynamic together plugs into a common pre-existing cliche, which D/P doesn't.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:38 am (UTC)I just meant, I'm talking about other writers... groups of writers. So it's a cumulative thing, especially since in fandom, writers' truths/personal visions interact & create fanon.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:40 am (UTC)Or a total adolescent-type rebellion against them, ahaha. See, this is why I love Utena.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:49 am (UTC)I just realised that what drives me mad is that you never write upgrades, just character development which I love, but then when we get it on meta-style you always throw literary contructs at me that make me want to spin around dementedly spitting fire. :D :D
META TRULY IS EVIL.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 04:53 am (UTC)I fully agree that meta is evil and argument fruitless, however.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 05:04 am (UTC)- why are we having this flamewar again?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 05:06 am (UTC)AHAHAHAHAHflk;jasdflkjd
no subject
Date: 2004-11-28 05:14 am (UTC)YOU STARTED IT WHEN YOU DISSED P AND D'S PURE LOVE, WHICH I DON'T EVEN SHIP, BTW.