reenka: (a little possessed?)
Re: the 12983348th attempt to ask the eternal question of whether it's polite to do concrit on, in this case, holiday fics, I mostly agree with this comment (....heh... *cough*) about 'finding your own truth' in a request-- in theory, yeah. (In practice, I've only left two reviews and they were both a total squee, 'cause I don't actually comment if I don't like it, and in fact I generally don't comment even if I do like it.) Theoretically though, if you don't 'find your own truth', it's the equivalent of bad porn no matter how you slice it (or, to quote directly, "a cobbled together clip show", ahahahahafiklajhskjfhas). Man.
    But this gets into my general issues with writing stuff on command (like, sometimes it works out great & is an inspiration, but most of the time I'd probably want to beat my head in because of the sheer impossibility of writing what someone asked & still retain my dignity/self-respect... I like a good challenge, though). People said you shouldn't critique -because- it was written on command so you're really critiquing the requester's kinks, but... really, why would one write something one thought was stupid? I tried once (with an old cross-dressing fic) and do not care to do so again -.-

What it really made me think of is the somewhat interesting split here between 'Art' for the sake of Art and social ethics, especially the whole gift culture thing . . .
...*snip*! )
~~

...One of these days, [livejournal.com profile] metafandom will shock me and someone'll come up with something REALLY NEW & DIFFERENT to talk about. Or at least amusing. Until then, I'll be over here, beating my head against the wall watching straight boys lick each other :D :D
    (Although the real problem is that it's easier to comment on things you've thought about 1918309348093 times before and don't actually need to make an effort to write about. *sigh*)
    I really liked [livejournal.com profile] thelana's post on [not] rereading/rewatching things-- I don't either, though my memory's not -that- reliable that I remember the general plot every episode of something I enjoyed. Generally I just get everything I was going to get from an experience/book the first time, and I don't stay interested if I start reading 'cause it comes back to me as I go, and my sense of 'must find out what happens' is 0, and most stories aren't good enough to enjoy even knowing what happens. I do sometimes 'dip in' to my favorite parts, especially with comics or books I love a lot, so much that I sort of remember where the good parts are. I can just read a few paragraphs or pages and it'll come back to me fresh, whereas I'll only have a vague recollection if I didn't remind myself at all. Um, not like this is really of any use to anyone or all that interesting, but. ^^;

I also love these hilarious (...yet disturbingly hot) bodice-ripper covers <3<3<3<3 ...Or should that be crotch-ripper??
reenka: (get that sulky groove thang)
Thinking further about the love semantics thread that won't die, a basic question just struck me: is it even -possible- to call yourself an idealist/romantic if what you idealize is partly the imperfection or flawed nature of something [love]? I mean, is the disagreement because people "fully" idealize love by giving it only its very best possible qualities and I idealize it by just really valuing it in all its messed-up painful glory? On some 'ideal' level that can encompass psycho murderers killing their lovers, I basically think all things that pass for love in any individual are 'Good' & 'Right'; the [often messed-up/crazy/violent] consequences are of course another story. I sometimes get messed up like this 'cause I want to see these things (Love, Imagination, Truth, Reason) as basically positive, but they only are in their application. Even knowing they can be seriously fucked with in practice, I still idealize/super-admire them. Which. Makes me an idealist, non?
    It occurs to me that maybe the idea is that as an idealist, you're supposed to seek perfection in whatever concept/philosophical construct you fancy, and if you don't find it, you find things [reality] lacking and on some level, false. I mean, you'd have to be really mired in semantics to say this, but I suppose this way one can actually argue that I'm not a romantic or an idealist o_0 Which is... REALLY not true. Uh. o_0 But fact remains someone can (and did) disagree with me -because- they're 'a romantic'. *_____*

...Though I used to be more -naive- than I am now, certainly, as well as more depressed & frustrated 'cause I always realized the world pretty much sucked and there was no obvious way to just... y'know, FIX IT (...while remaining basically lazy and avoidant, but shush) :P But then I learned to relax and love the fuck ups. Most of the time. In any case, it's weird to think that 'real' idealism = beating your head against a brick wall because it's not, in fact, a wooden wall-- and THEREFORE IT'S NOT A *REAL* WALL, you see. I hope not. I mean, I already do enough of that anyway (witness my posts on H/D -.-)

...cut 'cause I know no one cares, hahah. )
reenka: (this is my life -.-)
I was sort of out of it & meh today, and then.....

....

Draco gasped as his eyes landed on the image high above him. He was the picture of debauched. “Oh yes, my lovely,” Harry said, his eyes meeting Draco’s in the mirror, “You were just made to be my slut.”

*cackles*

Am I the only one getting images of Evil Old Witch!Harry & Pure Blond Innocent!Draco alone in the woods?

"I SHALL HAVE YOU, MY PRETTY!!1 HAVE YOU I SHALL!!"

"Noooo, noooo DON'T HURT ME MASTER! I SHALL BE A GOOD LITTLE SLYTHERIN THIS YEAR!"

*evil chuckle* "But what shall I have for my soup except your lovely white bones, my dearie? Ohoho!"

*sigh*
...Sorry, I... had to get that out -.- Goddamn, back to GW & The Sentinel fic for me. Ahhh, sanity, I've missed you while I've been gone... *___*
...mer. -.- )
~~

Speaking of things I enjoy (because I may as well, right?), presenting...
    THE POWER OF PANTS!!
    (it just had to be capslocked, didn't it?) It's an absolutely hilarious BL one-shot by Ryo Mutobe that's basically how I wish all BL was-- over-the-top and wackt and yet adorably realistic, too. *sigh* I dunno, it really isn't like I just like angst & lust and fucked-up psychos, etcetc... :> Maybe it's a bipolar-type thing 'cause I just like extremes-- couples who're lifebonded and have total trust and dedication and couples who're totally unstable and intense. And also totally boyish/girlish silly shenanigans. I just don't like blah predictability :/ ...shhhh, you people who think romance = always predictable :P

"...A regional survey regarding penis circumferences" >:D Man, it's a seriously cute oneshot, hehe :>
    I mean, I was reading the current xkcd comic strip about how 'Teh Penis' (tm) is Not All It's Cracked Up To Be & I was like, well, that's cute/a nice sentiment but awfully naive. It's just way too amusing and built into human nature besides. Telling boys not to obsess with their penis is probably like telling squirrels not to obsess over nuts, I mean, they're only yea big.... :>
reenka: (Default)
I was just thinking-- reading a summary of the latest chapter of Youka Nitta's married-couple series ('Haru wo Daiteita') where Iwaki and Katou are always ruminating on what it means to be an actor & how that applies to their relationship-- when Iwaki thought about how 'pointless' (if tempting) it is to compare oneself to others [as an actor] & that he understood this when he 'won against' himself. I think, y'know, this really applies to how I feel about writing, too.

Usually my sense of satisfaction in writing comes from the feeling that I've addressed something I thought was fascinating within my thoughts (about canon, characters, etc) or intense within my feelings (this could have any source & use fanfic as an outlet, so that 'H/D' is really 'The Default Couple' I play with). This is my default, but that's because I'm a hermit-- I think it's really almost impossible to escape when part of a community.
    I mean, yes, I felt purged when various conversations & ideas I've had about H/D came together & I wrote that Sectumsempra fic (even though I really couldn't stand the idea of most HBP AUs). It's such a release when things finally percolate and combust forcefully inside your mind to produce a fic out of nowhere, with the right push at the right time. My sense of pleasure is purely personal, feeling I've painted one more corner of my inner H/D cosmos, unrelated to the fact that objectively I think the fic is sloppy, somewhat emotionally overwrought & incomplete :P

    Anyway, I was just skimming a few of the holiday-comm H/D fics & recent stuff on [livejournal.com profile] hd_prophet, and it was pretty depressing to realize all over again just how out of sync I am with fandom (prompting a sense of guilt for writing 'just for myself' 'cause this means I don't communicate the differences/ideas I find important & try to get them out there too).
    *sigh*/ramble/etcetc... )
reenka: ("....")
Duuuude, I love Vienna Teng's Atheist Christmas Carol *_____* I know, I know, I'm a sap :D

...On that note, I actually made this with [livejournal.com profile] djinniyah's unwitting collaboration (though she says she doesn't mind):


    So yeah, a post-HBP!Harry soundtrack... mostly to inspire myself to write. -.-; )
~~

    TOTAL TIME: 1:11
    DOWNLOAD: here.

~~

Also, Fic [repost]~! I posted this under lock yesterday, but have since fixed it up a tiny bit, so :P Warning for songfic...ness & asshole!Harry, as per usual.
    ( Sleep to Dream - an HBP H/D AU )
reenka: (a little obsessed?)
This was locked 'cause I wrote it while half-asleep, but uh... it's not anymore -.-;; I fixed it up a bit. Not a lot though, so beware of falling participles :P

It's an HBP AU (I KNOW!!) spin off from the Sectumsempra scene, as per [livejournal.com profile] malafede's request. Uh. As a warning, I listened to 'Nothing Compares 2 U'. On repeat -.-

`Sleep to Dream' - H/D - NC17 or so - Of course Malfoy is a dick and he deserved it, so why is Harry feeling sick? )
reenka: (get that sulky groove thang)
Obviously I don't know when to give up & go to sleep, 'cause I skimmed yet -more- essays/arguments in [livejournal.com profile] mannazone ('The Administration' comm) & I don't want to go into specifics, but it made me think about authorial intent in a slightly different way.
    The thing is, really, that it's a double-edged sword, isn't it? What I mean is, it is both necessary to understanding (illuminating?) some basic plot-points or developments when utilized in key/minimum amounts and completely poisonous when used to explain away a reader's genuine reactions to what actually did happen. Like, you can use a known case of 'intent' to debunk what I'd call a 'transformative theory'-- one that takes canon and makes it a metaphor for something else, some external symbology. A good example of this is the things Harry/Hermione shippers found in book 3 to support canon H/Hr: those things were just contrary to the point of the given scenes, and you can call upon authorial intent as support of this argument. However, you can only use it to disprove actual conclusions from specific incidents: you can't disprove subtext or ambiguous cues (whether used for H/Hr, Sirius/Remus or even Harry/Draco subtext).

In other words, you can't say 'seeing' Sirius/Remus isn't a valid emotional response to canon cues; you -can- say it's not actually canon. Does that make sense?

Somehow this seems even more important when the author is actually there to argue with you; when they get involved and interact with fandom.
    etcetcetc... )

What I'm trying to say is, 'Authorial Intent' is useful for understanding, but it cannot-- should not-- attempt to penetrate a reader's heart. In theory, I can accept 'this isn't love'-- objectively, things remain ambiguous. In terms of my own reaction, though, there is no ambiguity-- the bells ring, the numbers add up, my alarms go off-- bingo! I can shout it from the rooftops! I embrace subjectivity, since as a reader, it's become my story and in a very real sense these are my characters 'cause they also live in my head, so. This doesn't mean 'in my head', Draco Malfoy 'really' turns into this svelte angel who wears leather pants (or someone who's about to whisper sweet nothings anytime soon)-- y'know, because he's just... not like that. However, yes, my Draco Malfoy can be obsessed and in denial; my Toreth can be also. Yes. Oh yes. I can make this work with canon, okay.

So bite it. HE'S IN LOVE. :P
reenka: (get that sulky groove thang)
In my increasing habit of asking rhetorical questions so I don't have to think too hard: what is it when even when 'you' see an argument you disagree with in fannish circles (see example in the community for [livejournal.com profile] ms_manna's Administration series), what bothers 'you' isn't the faulty argument assumptions but rather the form of argument? (...and NO, it's not that it's impolite :P haha)
    No, what really gets up my collar is things like projection, over-simplification, people who simply don't -read- the other person's comments closely enough, and various other forms of 'conversational terrorism'. It gets to the point where even when I basically agree with a person, I have to fight the urge to go, OKAY, BUT YOU'RE OVER-SIMPLIFYING AND EXAGGERATING FOR YOUR OWN ENDS, DUDE!! :O!!1 STOP THAT, STOP THAT RIGHT NOW!! (...this is what happens when one's mum is a rationalist conversational Nazi, man... one gets a bit... sensitive. -.- Okay, so most of the time I don't really care or take it seriously, but it builds up, okay. Plus it's worse when I actually otherwise respect the other person's opinion. -.-;)

...oh, who cares ^^;; )
~~

In other news, I still think Blair is hot :D

hm. GIP?

Nov. 26th, 2006 02:44 pm
reenka: (a little obsessed?)
...what is it when you're no longer merely annoyed by the stupid things in fandom, but also annoyed by [most flavors of] perfectly 'justified' bitching about said stupid things in fandom about as much?? [Sadly hypocritical, considering how much I rant, but I NEVER SAID I WAS CONSISTENT, DID I. Uh. *cough*]

Is that like fandom senescence, like where you've reached the level of meta-discontent that you no longer have any choice but to retire to a far-off colony, alone with your porn?? Yeay, finally!!1 (Except... come to think of it, I was always like this. Damn.)

It's like for me, finally, everything has balanced out-- the good and bad, stupid and brilliant, to the point where the whole [online] world is a nice, featureless, innocuous fog. Or maybe that's just so I don't snap at people randomly and go SHUT UP ALREADY, YES I KNOW YOU HATE X AND X IS RUINING YOUR FANDOM EXPERIENCE, KTHNX! GAR! ARG! ...And then I'd turn into a huge T-Rex and start bashing buildings. (The T-Rex would have nice frizzy black hair, too.) That would be satisfying. And this... this is why I uh, avoid people -.-; And thought. And bagels. Repeat after me: THERE IS ONLY PORN!@!!!E1iorjaklfsajklaj;f

What I mean to say is (in my spastic way) that what one focuses on is what one sees, in fandom or canon or wherever. Like... if you're determined to dislike something/someone, you will dislike it/them. If, on the other hand, you're determined to enjoy yourself, you'll do that instead. Far be it from me to have really learnt that lesson at this point, but. I'm just sayin', y'know. Not that preferences are illusory, but that biases can be worked around-- like, I have lots of biases against things/behaviors/people/etc, and then I read something that works around them and omg, suddenly it works. And I -much- prefer that feeling of suddenly enjoying a concept/type of person/etc I didn't before than dwelling on my discomfort. Not that it's easy or necessarily always possible to find that 'magic bullet' solution, and I pretty much hate overly-positivist Pollyanna types, but. Mmm, emotional equilibrium!

Uh, yes. My point was to say that [livejournal.com profile] _ri's 'Foe Transfiguration' (D/Hr comic-- observe icon) is one of those things that keeps me sane, that breaks free of the fog of SUCK and makes me go 'oh wait, the sun'll come out... tomorrow...' etcetc. That and her rare doodles, like this one of Ron. ♥♥♥ Oh Ron. Most fanart so does not do you justice, but. *melty*
    EDIT - And then there's [livejournal.com profile] gredandfeorge's Harry & Snape gen art. I'm really gaga over gen art & little else in HP, it seems, ahaha. Or in... any fandom, per se, unless you count lurking & reading Sentinel fic plus random vids ^^;;;

Also, I just had this weird moment seeing a lit-geeky girl on a personals site (which I sometimes dip into to reassure myself I don't, in fact, ever want to meet someone random from online ever ever again) say, "when i was young, i fell in love with fictional characters and spent hours trying to walk through my mirror". Heh. And I was like '...wait, wait... is that weird that I still do that? I mean, freak!Reena-type weird?'
    And then... I realized, wait, FANDOM. And I felt normal again (or as normal as I ever feel). Oh fandom <3. There's one thing it's good for :D I mean, okay, so most of us aren't IN LOVE the way 10 year-old dreamy girls fall in love (...I think), but. It's the same... sort of... thing. Or something. Right. *COUGHS* >.> In any case, I fall in love with characters the way other people pick strangers up at bars-- man. And this is why I don't GO to bars, I guess. ^^;;;;; I mean, in real life, it's Not A Good Idea to keep being interested in pretty, 'interesting' people if you're painfully introverted and dorky... unless you're also masochistic. Not to be a downer, but. Y'know. Yeah. Lots more emotional risk & lots less real likelihood you'll like what you find out when it gets personal, in general. BUT ANYWAY.

...And now to watch Season 1 of The Sentinel (FINALLY!!1)
reenka: (this is my life -.-)
You may have (or uh, may not have) noticed that I don't really... write serious meta anymore. I sort of ramble in my deluded little way, but I don't sit there for 3 hours-- sometimes over several days-- and make up theses and ideas and arguments based on current fandom events. Hey, it's fine, I just thought I was lazy and burnt out-- I know I am. Reading this exchange on [livejournal.com profile] dkwilliams' recent fannish-manners post, it occurred to me really why: there is no point.
    I mean, okay, I've read these sorts of posts dozens of times over the last few years, and do you know how often I've seen people change each other's minds? More specifically, how often I've seen the original poster modify their position after commenters' input? With the exception of myself, there's only [livejournal.com profile] sistermagpie that comes to mind in terms of someone who does that consistently-- I mean, my friends listen to me, but that's generally because they already know me/respect my opinion/etc [I assume]. That is-- people who don't know each other don't tend to do that. They don't change their minds; they don't really listen to each other, and if they do, it's only long enough to reiterate their point yet again.

This whole eternal politeness 'debate' is such a great example of this phenomenon, because as [livejournal.com profile] witchqueen said so well in the comments, basically we can't agree on what 'politeness' (or ANY given ethical/literary/etc construct) means from person to person, situation to situation. Why can't we agree? And what about when we -do- agree, Reena [you may ask].
    Well, it's true that sometimes people have a shared context-- often because of an equivalent educational background. Meaning, if you both finished an American university within the last 25 years, you probably have the skills to mediate whatever disagreements are left after the, y'know, brainwashing :D That said, I'm not at all an innate subjectivist; meaning, I don't believe people's behavior is right, I just observe it :P

Mostly, [in their semi-mythical 'natural' state] people think differently; they have different assumptions, different contexts they use as jumping off points-- and most of the time they don't pause to compare-and-contrast before they muddle in and get offended. Unless you -do- have people who're willing to listen and pay attention to each other's context (generally friends or trained academics), what you have is basically Babel fandom, as is-- sort of an in-between trade-off where no one's ever completely happy if they're using some specific ideal 'standard' to measure it by besides 'is this hot?' and 'will my friends like it?' On the plus side, lots & lots of people use that non-standard. 'Cause, y'know, here for fun. Don't care about little details.

You know, I really think 98% of so-called recurrent 'fandom debates' could be 'resolved' thusly:
    Q: Why do you think this way/do this? Don't you realize it's non-canon/non-good/non-ethical and just plain ol' NOT NICE? [*sniffle* or *grrrrr* = optional]
    A: Because I am like this/that's what I like/believe/want for myself. ['Now take that and shove it' = optional]
    Q: Why are you like that/why do you like that? Don't you REALIZE how WRONG and SAD it is?
    A: BECAUSE. Uh, because I said so. ['BECAUSE FILTHY DUUURTY PR0N IS MY CONSTITUTIONAL HERITAGE AS AN AMERICAN!!1 ...AND SO IS TELLING YOU TO FUCK YOURSELF, HAR HAR!' = optional]
    Q: You're really an ignorant mongrel, aren't you?
    A: No, YOU ARE (but what am I?).
    Q: Don't you want to get better & CHANGE? ['Here, let me help you and write this delightfully helpful 'tutorial' post on how NOT TO SUCK DONKEY EGGS' = optional]
    A: No. Let's agree to disagree.*

*Note: I hate that phrase :> And neither do I think most people actually -mean- it in the sense that they'll henceforth personally accept the validity of other people's dissenting opinions (which they really disagree with)-- they'll just stop arguing with -them- about it. When the next sucker starts trying to discuss it, of course it'll start over. This is made even more insane by the obvious fact that not all opinions -are- actually equally valid, so any rational person must eventually accept that they may very well be -right- but it doesn't matter. (In fandom, I mean... in terms of real social change, eventually things do change-- though decades pass-- and like, uh, some really annoying constants in terms of human behavior always remain anyway, like, oh I dunno, RUDENESS for instance.)
    In the end, I take the side of the rude people (not that they have an organized 'side', generally, which makes it difficult to rant against them, BUT ANYWAY I'm trying to be general here) just because I'm against arguing against constants because it's-- I dunno, less productive than rudeness. I sort of admire a person who knows exactly what they want to -achieve- by being an asshole, though this rarely actually happens. ^^; That said, there's a difference between 'arguing against' and ranting against/letting off steam; I rant against lots of things I know very well will never change, just 'cause I'd go [more] insane if I didn't :/

PS: I actually wanted to write a meta post about Richard Matheson's '7 Steps to Midnight' (which is an awesome book if not for the romance), plot, obsession, and seeing 'Stranger than Fiction' a few days ago, but. Somehow, my motivation's a little low :>

[PS]

Nov. 18th, 2006 06:42 pm
reenka: (anybody in here?)
The thing I couldn't quite articulate yesterday when talking about the lack of badass-yet-flawed women characters (like Faith) is what I meant by them being 'romantic'. I thought about what it is that Faith (and Catwoman, etc) has and characters like Buffy or Arya don't, quite, and what 6th Season!Willow does (somewhat) and I think it's... it's that 'going bad' factor.
    This is largely a male-dominated style of 'romanticism' in that the badass hero darkens, becomes not only flawed but tainted, struggling against themselves. Here's this strong character not only challenged but nearly defeated by the inner demons they're struggling against. Their chances of even being anti-heroes successfully (and not just dead or completely lost) are in question; they are on a darker Hero's Journey than a character like Buffy, who is strong and flawed and heavily conflicted but always basically 'in the safe zone'.

I think I totally got distracted talking about Femme Fatales, because the important thing there is the darkness-- though it helps if it's a sexually tinged sort of thing, but that's just natural with a grown female (which is why Arya is out of the running for now). I guess it's the difference between 'flawed' and 'tainted', but it's also important they're conflicted-- lots of tainted/strong villain-type women, I guess, but that's not my thing either, because their types of weakness tends to be too obviously fatal, if that makes sense. Thinking of Drusilla, I guess.

Hm. This is sort of a noir sensibility, but the thing is that in that genre, you mostly have men of that type and Femme Fatale women that are just objects of the male hero's gaze. I also think that noir-style 'dark' women aren't typically fleshed out that much, right. Maybe it's more that if there -are- strong women, they tend to be portrayed positively, even if they're 'flawed'; this is about walking the line between the hardass selfish arrogance and genuine, conflicted attempts at being a decent human being. I'm always a sucker for that story in guys, and it's just delicious when it's (rarely) about girls. *sigh*
reenka: (because draco is a little BITCH.)
Man... I'm rewatching my BtVS Faith vids on a whim, and of course it's reminding me how awesome Faith is, so I'm trying to think of women that I think are hardcore as much as she is [in fandom]. And. It's difficult -.-

All I'm coming up with is Scully (don't laugh!!), Arya (well, there's a GRRM fandom), and well, there's Willow & Buffy in BtVS too (as well as other 'solid' female characters), but I'm less thinking of 'good strong female characters' & more... really COOL, hardcore female characters that are totally as badass, selfish & violent as the guys (or as coolly rational & competent, whatever). Y'know, girls that make you starry-eyed. Uh. Not the most objective measure in the world, I realize ^^;; Buffy herself is sort of like that in my head. Ginny in HBP is sort of a bad parody of a girl like that :)) I love the type, though, when they're more like Faith (more honest about being hardass, I mean) and less like Ginny, I guess. Though I like Ginny. -.- I used to make my Pansy like that, but people have told me she's OOC enough times that I'm like 'uh... oh well' :))
    Oooh, McGonagall is like that :D :D :D She doesn't make me starry-eyed (most of the time), though -.-

...heh. )

...In other news, I finally watched ep 1 of The Sentinel today. And MAN. I can't believe I actually enjoy the show almost as much as the fic. I mean, they're pretty, but it's so cheesy & lame but I CAN'T HELP IT 'cause it's like... you can already tell it's About Jim & Blair-- like if Brian/Justin is sex-without-commitment, here you have aaaaall the platonic commitment EVER, just no sex. I think I actually prefer the latter :D Though if you know me, you know I only mean 'in small doses', y'know, ahahah.
reenka: (this is my life -.-)
This is going to sound a bit weird, but... how do you guys write fanfic? *___*

I was just thinking that as much as I really -wish- I could write non-HP stuff (well, I guess I really 'should' write more original stuff since I -could-, but ignoring that for a moment)... I have severe issues with writing in other fandoms. Even ones I fall in love with that have extremely hot and sympathetic leads (*cough*BLAIR*cough*)

...okay, I'll spare you, ahahah. )
reenka: (wee!harry = love! :P)
Well, it's November, which means it's time for the gwyaoi.org annual Illustrated Novella contest, so I'm all primed for vids ('cause of The Sentinel), and obviously yaoi and anime :D

Anyway, the 'Gay Boyfriend' vid with the multiple shows (PoT & GW & Evangelion & Tokyo Babylon & YnM and so on) is just adorable and hilarious and makes me feel like a vindicated crazed yaoi fangirl. Yus. :D And also, Relena is especially fitting as a 1x2 fangirl. Yeah, it's pretty much pure crack :D The original video for that song (for comparison) is even more crack *___* Almost.
    PS: Just in case you need to know more, just read the lyrics to the song by The Hazzards :D :D It kinda... says it all :)) Even though it's... uh... not the most flattering portrait of yaoi fangirls, but IT'S SO ACCURATE AHAHAHklfjsakljfdskljg;lkjsfdlkjg But mostly I love the vid 'cause there's so much boylove UST in shounen anime, there really is. :D :D It's sort of like a yaoi fangirl anthem, it really is :D

...man, I really love [good] vids. A lot. So it's sort of sucks that my main fandom for years is the one exception, where not only do most vids suck (not to mention there just -aren't- a lot), but I don't associate the movies with the characters ^^;
    Sometimes, you know, I feel like I should be over H/D [not to mention HP] by now, but Draco really is My Gay Boyfriend ♥♥♥ HEE. And it's not exactly surprising, anyway, considering I'm still not over 1x2 or Kirk/Spock or Peter Pan or... uh, anything I've ever loved. -.-
reenka: (this is my life -.-)
You know, I just noticed that I use the word 'porn' quite a lot on this lj. Um. I dunno how I should feel about that, but. I'm pretty positive-minded about porn, really. I'm even tempted to say 'any porn is good porn', but I don't actually believe it; for instance, some porn is Really Bad (quality), and that does bother me. I don't mean it's unhot or whatever (since that's all kink/preference); I mean it's just lame & tacky. Not that 'tacky' is a scientific term (though maybe it should be! the world would be a better place!!), but I Know It When I See it. It's like... I'm not even talking about writing, per se, 'cause you get this effect with visual stuff also. A bit like twinkies... oversaturated with cream and yet not exactly tiramisu-- well, the complete opposite of a tiramisu. Like, if 'tiramisu'!porn was a superhero, twinkie!porn would be its pathetically cackling, plans-revealing, yellow-spandex-wearing arch-nemesis. I'm just saying. :/ I don't mean softcore vs hardcore or artsy vs raw-- it's just... you can be hardcore and visceral and dirty and not... tacky. I think. I know it's lame to have a whole aesthetic of porn, but I really can't help myself, so. ^^;

Anyway! I started down this path 'cause I got a review on aff.net on my PG13/R-ish non-explicit old Ron/Ginny fic (from a guy!!) saying that my Ron was unrealistic because he didn't just jump to uh, 'lay [his] cock on her sex ready pussy' and didn't have enough 'balls' to just kind of go 'YEAY, INCESTUOUS SEX TIME!' ahahahahahahahfalkjslkaj;klfjsd;lkjgdlfkjggs That's pretty classic, I think. But that's what I mean by 'tacky' :P Uh. I don't mind the comment, it's really the bit with the 'sex ready pussy' that gets to me ^^;

I was also thinking about people's hang-ups ('cause, uh, was that a hang-up??), reading this post in comicsworthreading.com about an article in Wizard magazine where they did a poll/quiz on various artists' chick's butts in comics. And people were all offended 'cause WOE! Women's butts objectified in comics??? O RLY??! That sort of thing. I think it's pretty hilarious 'cause... hi, whole history of American comics, have we met? Also, uhh, what's wrong with being a little gratuitously pervy? There's even a word for this in Japanese-- sort of harmless perviness, differentiating 'bad/hardcore/twisted perv' [hentai] and 'good/mild kinky perv' [ecchi] (...hopefully, this makes my intermittent porn references cutely 'ecchi', haha). Those butts were just... mildly ecchi. I mean... repressed much? Man. -.-

...a part of me suspects that people get up in arms because in the US we like to think we keep our pr0n & our 'normal' stuff totally segregated, without the ambiguous 'bridge' ecchi-type material; like, porn might be good, but OVER THERE IN THAT CORNER. This is obviously complete bollocks, taking a look at our actual pop-culture, the TV & movies and so on, but... I think US media is like... provocative without really enjoying its own ecchi flavor. It's like the ecchiness is there to get people to buy stuff or watch the show rather than for the Joy of Perv. Or whatever.

So I was also thinking of how there was a spate of posts righteously defending 'the People's Right to Pr0n' recently, and it occurred to me that the more you justify & rationalize smuttiness/perversion, the less fun it becomes-- because isn't the attraction that of The Forbidden most of the time anyway? Like... I think a lot of the kinks -I- have in fic developed because they started off breaking some taboo & I felt like they 'should' be Just Plain Wrong, except I liked that. So going on and on about how it's actually perfectly fine & reasonable to be kinky seems to be missing the point; isn't at least half the initial appeal of incest & exhibitionism and even your average 'vanilla' boy/boy slash because it's just... shocking? Deliciously abnormal? Something like that, anyway; at least enough so that it seems ridiculous to either attack smut with the 'but It's So Wrong' line or defend it purely on that basis.

(Whatever you think is) filthy-dirty-wrong = HOT!

I'm not discovering America here, I know, but it's amazing how people just... forget that :>
reenka: (damned if i don't)
There's this weird feeling I get skimming through these short little fics by [livejournal.com profile] ___visions, especially Same, but also this poem-like thing. It's like, it's not -good- or polished or particularly concerned with canon, but... what I really like is that it gives me The Feeling. Like hearing a tune you know and love, even if it's sung off-key and a sounds a little hokey with that harmonica or whatever. It's like it's got its heart in the right place, or something.

I particularly like the beginning, which reads a lot like one of the myriad angsty intellislashy H/D fics I imprinted on back in '02. I used to write about Draco's "moon-white complexion", man. I know it's kinda lame, but I'm still nostalgic about it; tragic-yet-spiteful skinny-as-a-reed Draco with his sharp cheekbones and sharper words. Heh. Okay, so then the ficlet goes completely off-course, but I like the beginning, pleasantly pre-OoTP as it is.

The whole aesthetic's mostly different now, y'know. People (writers) seem to have completely accepted Draco as someone who needs compassion; he's not much of a badboy or controversial figure in the fandom anymore, even if he is to -Harry- (at least, moreso). And I know it's just plain wrong to say Harry hated him more than the Dursleys 'at first sight', but that's exactly the sort of thing I miss; the sort of Harry who's plagued by Draco, who's insecure and resentful rather than, y'know, 'a perfect boyfriend'. This is hilarious, in a way, since HBP was pretty much a ripe breeding ground for angst; Harry was plagued by Draco-- his ghost, almost, seeing as how he was mostly in absentia (though of course most people took it sexually). You know... like, I think I just... am an angst-hound in H/D, more than I usually am with other pairings. They just... do it so well :>
    Ahahaha, I just got feedback on a really old fluff-fic from '02 ('My Favourite Things') saying my Draco was the 'perfect boyfriend' (!!!!!!!!) and yet IC somehow (!!!!!) so now I have angst :)) I was actually thinking of reading [livejournal.com profile] helenish's Ron/Draco fics 'cause I absolutely adore her Sentinel stuff, but... nooooooo. I'm still chained. :>

...I kind of miss [my old] fandom. :/ I love bitter/angry lovesongs for H/D ♥
reenka: (this is my life -.-)
Sooo... continuing my trend of posting things no one wants to read (:P) I've decided to embrace my lameness and ponder randomly about... things. BECAUSE IS THAT NOT WHAT LIVEJOURNAL IS FOR, I ASK YOU. Also, I've been doing that anyway. ^^;;

Reading a random geek lj profile, of course I started thinking about Blair (my Geek of the Week... though possibly month), and how weird it would be if I stopped writing about people who're really Not Like Me At All (...say, Draco) and started once again to write about people I could understand a little too well, ahahah. Wouldn't that be scary?? Man. Well, there's Luna, but it's just not the same 'cause... okay, the problem is that in the universe she's in, she's not cool, really. I DON'T KNOW WHY. If you put her in the real world, she'd be plenty cool. OR SO I TELL MYSELF. :D Like, if I saw her on OkCupid (SHUT UP), I'd be like 'Oooh, a friend!' and I might message her, though of course I probably wouldn't 'cause I pretty much never message anyone, like, EVER.

It would be fun to write about geeks, anyway. I think it's just also difficult 'cause I write emotionally... like, about people's emotional lives, not their thinky lives (generally). And geeks tend to have... um... how do I say this... but yes. Problems. *coughs* In that area :D Like, if they're honest, they'd tell you so themselves (and hey, I know this judging from myself, if anything). So it would be a long, pathetic story about like, how messed up and alone Geekboy is, and how he'll never actually talk to That Girl whom he's not worthy of and/or too good for and/or something else, and there'd be lots of rationalizations and extremely annoying (for me as a writer) hang-ups, etcetc. Or it would be the same old story about meeting someone that finally gets them and settling down, ahaha, happily or unhappily doesn't matter. So maybe I've just dissuaded myself, but. Still. GEEKS. ♥. BLAIR!!!1 ♥.
    (See, see, neither Snape nor Hermione are really 'geeks' in that cute-dorky-bumbling-yet-smrt!!1 way but rather over-achieving 'intellectuals'-- see, what makes a geek an 'intellectual' is when they take themselves seriously & are ambitious, and then I can't write them AT ALL. It's weird; I just feel like mocking them, sort of affectionately of course.) Anyway, Blair is delightful 'cause he's easy-going and complicated & thinky-geek without being, y'know, 'serious'. Yes.

The kind of story I'd love to write that kind of character in is definitely an absurdist comedy, and you'd definitely have to pin them against an action-before-words type. Hee. See, that's what makes the set-up of The Sentinel so classically appealing to me-- I love that whole cliche of The Badass and The Geek (and have I also mentioned I like juvenile stereotypes when affectionately referred-to? BECAUSE I DO. 'Breakfast Club' = one of my favorite movies EVAR, so). Um. What was my point?

I think my point is that I randomly end up at OkCupid & follow geeky interesting-seeming people's links to their lj, go 'oh, they seem interesting', only to then go BUT BLAIR! BLAAAAAAIR!! ...and then I'm lost. :))
reenka: (under pressure!)
This is bad. Just when I should be doing... oh, a zillion other, exciting (...not too sarcastic) things here in rainy, beautiful Seattle, I... uh, fell head-over-heels for Jim&Blair. Woe. :/ I feel a bit embarrassed, too, 'cause... it's not like they're the most... uhhh, deep or angsty pairing :P I mean, they -could- be, but they don't breathe 'deep meaningfulness' or whatever, mostly 'cause there's nothing too tragic (unless you count Blair's eventual semi-positive self-sacrifice, but that's more in the 'awww' category as well, for me. I CAN'T HELP IT. SO CUTE.)

Aaaanyway. Funny thing is, I'm more H/D-ey than I was like, a year ago, when I felt all burnt out and like 'okay, HBP. now what. NOW NOTHING.' so. Things are pretty much normal in Reena-land, probably. I mean, I've accepted that [99.9% of other people's] H/D fanfic doesn't do it for me, but that... that's okay, hahaha, I've accepted it. I've moved on!! :D I can still write them & think about them without constantly being bitter that I can't read them (...or write them) the way I like, haha. I know, AMAZING :D

I mean, yesterday I was trudging through the rain and my own sleep-deprived Sentinel-obsessed exhaustion in the dark, finally got to the mall and was sort of absent-mindedly thinking of my Ideal H/D Story-structure ('cause really, I could barely string two sentences together in my head and this is my default Thing, ahahah). I had to wait for like, 20 minutes for the person ahead of me to finish buying like, 10 zillion pale green towels, so I grabbed a handy catalog postcard & scribbled my ideas :> :>
    Funny, 'cause I was just thinking how I keep writing H/D fic and H/D meta, and rarely do the twin approaches meet; I know some (most? dunno) people who don't just write kinkfic write as a direct expression of their 'Ideas' on characters/plot, but I honestly don't; I -want- to, I guess, but I just don't plot things out in advance by nature, or -plan- things in advance, so I end up flying by the seat of my v. impulsive (and porn-obsessed) pants most of the time.

...Which means I write snarky fluff & porn and darkfic when I'm moody, basically :)) Oh, and unfinished never-posted WIPs where I actually -have- [somewhat disjointed] Ideas that putter out from lack of continuous energy-management skillz. :/ (In other words, I need someone to kick my butt to get me to finish this 'thinky'-type stuff, but no one volunteers, so... ahahahah. *cough*)

...So anyway, here's my Ideal Thinky Prototypical H/D outline chronology type-thing, the one I'd write but also the one I kinda... wanted to read. *coughs* Mostly, no one has written long H/D with all these elements (to my knowledge), including myself. In other words, this is The Way It Really Happens In My Head:
    if I ever got off my ass, that is. ^^;; )
reenka: (damned if i don't)
You know, I was kind of... semi-moody today (clearly not enough Sentinel & too much trying to do other stuff... and failing) but then I watched Diana Williams' Sentinel vid, 'This Kiss' and... OH. MY. GAHD *_____*

YOU HAVE TO WATCH IT :(( WATCH IIIIIIIT :( I want to know if a slash-lovin' person -can- watch that thing & remain unmoved. It's... it's.. OH MY GAHD. I HAVE NO WORDS. ONLY AWE-STRUCK NOISES.

(And there's also this utterly awesome HP Snape-vid if you scroll down, too. Seriously, 'Bad Reputation' & Snape go so well together. It actually made me go 'eeeeee, SNAPE!'. Of course, that's nothing to 'EEEE, JIM & BLAIR ARE SO MARRIED, THEY ACTUALLY HAVE FLUFFY KITTENS GROWING OUT OF THEIR EARS!!!1' ahem.) Anyway, if by chance anyone needs a pick-me-up today... just trust me. WATCH THAT VID *_____*
reenka: (and lucifer said - 'i go first biatch!')
Man, I miss all my Sandman volumes sometimes... though not my old 60+ Star Trek novels, hahah. I can't even imagine getting them from my mom's apt... talk about embarrassing. I was just reading through this sort of metatastic post on despair and of course I thought of Despair. Heh, I used to identify with her & Delirium quite a lot... but well, they're kinda flip-sides of the same coin, though I suppose this leaves Desire in the lurch. Well, maybe Desire's first, Delirium second, and Despair last. That is to say, Death is really last, but then she's also first; heheh you can tell that Sandman is like, my most ideal story ever, right? It's still up there-- my #1-- and it's weird, but I've never liked Neil's other work nearly as much. It's like The Sandman was just too perfect a fusion of story & writer, or something, and once you hit that sort of level, anything else is bound to disappoint. Or maybe that's just me, the person who's never been able to read any other Arthur&Merlin retelling after deciding at age 12-13 that Mary Stewart's Merlin was perfect (funny how I love fanfic and fairy-tale retellings so much, but then I don't usually think of any story as 'perfect', thank god... though I did sort of also lose interest in H/S for awhile after reading [livejournal.com profile] thisveryinstant's 'Truth'. As far as post-OoTP H/S goes, it's close enough to perfect for me).

I love that post's idea that despair is universal, unlike love-- either you know "it" or you don't. I was actually asking myself whether I could be absolutely sure I've felt "it", though, because... I think once you're out of it, it's hard to recall exactly. It fades, the way any intense emotion does, until you sort of recall it like a fugue of temporary insanity, sort of a black hole that sucks in normal memories and leaves you with vague impressions and shadows.

All this because I followed [livejournal.com profile] jahbulon from the latest xkcd strip post where he picked on one of those 'first comment!' people & replied to someone saying 'Who am I to judge' asking if they're sentient :D
    Anyway, this sent me on a tangent 'cause...
    I can't help myself ^^; )
~~

Anyway, uh, speaking of vids-- I'm guessing my flist isn't as enthusiastic as I am (but then that's probably a good thing), but... I've just found really cute & well-done (*SHOCK*!!) HP Harry-centric gen vids by [livejournal.com profile] ashinae, here :D :D :D OMG DAN IS SO WEE & ADORABLE IN FIRST YEAR when he isn't talking especially <3<3<3 It's really sort of sad that I'm still so easily stricken with pure adoration, but... AAAHHHH HARRY <33333333333333333333 :((
    I would almost stop plugging away at my WIPs sometimes, but then it's like... my baby :(( I CAN'T HELP IT :(( I'll prolly write gen every now and then even when the H/D mojo's left me :( Haha, I don't even have the excuse of thinking he's oh-so 'interesting' as a character or 'hot' or even 'fun/easy to write'... hell, my Harry characterization never feels quite right even to me, so it's always frustrating on some level. I totally write him just to express my love ♥. ...And yeah, 'Like Home', the R/S one, is also awesome. *sigh* Man, it makes my Remus fic gestate faster. Maybe in another year it'll finally get born. :> Y'know, the song ('Chocolate' by Snow Patrol) really helps me understand why R/T would eventually happen if R/S also did, just in terms of emotional logic. Poor Remus; it totally makes sense that he only loved Sirius 'like that' but it's not like... it's not like he expected anything.

    What have I done it's too late for that
    What have I become truth is nothing yet
    A simple mistake starts the hardest time
    I promise I'll do anything you ask...this time


PS: Am currently watching The Sentinel vids *___* And I just have to say. They are... SO gay. I mean in canon. So gay. I know everyone thinks that about 'their' show, but I AM NOT KIDDING!!1 The OC? NOT GAY. Supernatural? NOT GAY. NOTHING IS GAY LIKE THIS, NOT EVEN BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN IS THIS GAY, ALL RIGHT *_____________* ...well, nothing except possibly, uh, pop boybands... and, okay, QAF *___*
Page generated Mar. 22nd, 2026 02:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios