~~ subversion aversion reversion....
Nov. 9th, 2004 05:32 pmAll right, this is going to sound weird, but... this is part of my long-running issue with the idea of subversive literary criticism. I realize it's my issue and may have limited application, as such.
So. Is it actually possible to subvert a text (or a system, also) by trying to subvert it, or in other words, make it turn in on itself (contradict itself)? For instance, given that you're a fan who is really in the community because you want to change the accepted-- or implicit-- definition/meaning of the text, at least within your own writing. Given that you're not there to 'work with' but rather 'work against' the text while using its boundaries (which would translate to 'remaining in character' as best you could). Would it actually be possible to apply the idea of 'success' to this endeavor?
Is there such a thing as 'success' at purposefully working against canon without attempting to create fanon? Can fanfiction hold some sort of direct dialogue with canon and act as an actual critique of it, and if so, is that even desirable to people who'd consider themselves fans or only people who in fact aren't fans, and would thus not want to read said fanfic?
My knee-jerk response seems to be 'no'. That is, I think that in order to hold such a dialogue with the original text, a fanfic writer would have to be both subversive and simultaneously(!) project their imagination to be part of the flow of canon. I believe you couldn't truly subvert without fully feeling out the shape of the source text-- understanding its biases, listening to its tones, accepting its idiosyncracies to some extent. I suppose I mean, you can't fully remake a 'parent' text on a certain level, because the readership will always be aware of the differences. You can't really subvert, can you, if it doesn't feel 'real'-- if the readers are just suspending their disbelief. If the fic doesn't read like a lost part of canon, basically.
In my Tolkien & Lewis class, we are allowed to write fanfic for our final project, and one of the stipulations of our professor's guidelines is that the story 'work with' the text. That is, she wants us to imitate the tone & language, and to have our fics really feel like they're part of that world. And since the general atmosphere is part of the world, one feels like to really write fic set in it, you'd have to adopt at least some aspect of the style of original portrayal. I'm not saying that's all that's worthwhile to do, since worth is naturally subjective, only that if the implicit goal is to set a fic in a borrowed world, you'd want to borrow as much as possible.
I think... this wouldn't concern me nearly as much if I didn't feel, with a sort of sinking sensation in my stomach, that nearly all the fic I've read in the HP fandom, -ever-, has been subversive in some way-- had set out to twist and play with canon (which is definitely fun) without a concurrent sense of also flowing along its lines. This goes beyond facts, precisely, and into atmosphere-- the feel of the original. So that when you read it, regardless of the quirks of the characters' behavior, you'd think, 'this is them! I am back there, in the world I love! I am back!' Admittedly, this is perhaps the most difficult thing a fan-writer could try to achieve, but it also seems that as a fan, it would be the most delightful.
And yeah, I realize that I'm talking about what sounds like 'genfic' through and through-- but boy, do I wish one could write slashfic & hetfic like that, too. It's the (good) comics-writer's model, really-- take an existing canon, write new issues with the past events/characterizations/styles in mind (hopefully), but expand to include new pairings, new adventures, new angles... like a hidden secret passage. Suddenly you think, oh my god, what if JK Rowling meant for this to happen? I totally thought this with slash sometimes-- like with Miss Breed's `Red', and Aspen's writing (hahaha!!). So like, you could have tricksy subversion that works by popping up when you've already decided 'oh good, danger's past'. That'd be so cool.
So. Is it actually possible to subvert a text (or a system, also) by trying to subvert it, or in other words, make it turn in on itself (contradict itself)? For instance, given that you're a fan who is really in the community because you want to change the accepted-- or implicit-- definition/meaning of the text, at least within your own writing. Given that you're not there to 'work with' but rather 'work against' the text while using its boundaries (which would translate to 'remaining in character' as best you could). Would it actually be possible to apply the idea of 'success' to this endeavor?
Is there such a thing as 'success' at purposefully working against canon without attempting to create fanon? Can fanfiction hold some sort of direct dialogue with canon and act as an actual critique of it, and if so, is that even desirable to people who'd consider themselves fans or only people who in fact aren't fans, and would thus not want to read said fanfic?
My knee-jerk response seems to be 'no'. That is, I think that in order to hold such a dialogue with the original text, a fanfic writer would have to be both subversive and simultaneously(!) project their imagination to be part of the flow of canon. I believe you couldn't truly subvert without fully feeling out the shape of the source text-- understanding its biases, listening to its tones, accepting its idiosyncracies to some extent. I suppose I mean, you can't fully remake a 'parent' text on a certain level, because the readership will always be aware of the differences. You can't really subvert, can you, if it doesn't feel 'real'-- if the readers are just suspending their disbelief. If the fic doesn't read like a lost part of canon, basically.
In my Tolkien & Lewis class, we are allowed to write fanfic for our final project, and one of the stipulations of our professor's guidelines is that the story 'work with' the text. That is, she wants us to imitate the tone & language, and to have our fics really feel like they're part of that world. And since the general atmosphere is part of the world, one feels like to really write fic set in it, you'd have to adopt at least some aspect of the style of original portrayal. I'm not saying that's all that's worthwhile to do, since worth is naturally subjective, only that if the implicit goal is to set a fic in a borrowed world, you'd want to borrow as much as possible.
I think... this wouldn't concern me nearly as much if I didn't feel, with a sort of sinking sensation in my stomach, that nearly all the fic I've read in the HP fandom, -ever-, has been subversive in some way-- had set out to twist and play with canon (which is definitely fun) without a concurrent sense of also flowing along its lines. This goes beyond facts, precisely, and into atmosphere-- the feel of the original. So that when you read it, regardless of the quirks of the characters' behavior, you'd think, 'this is them! I am back there, in the world I love! I am back!' Admittedly, this is perhaps the most difficult thing a fan-writer could try to achieve, but it also seems that as a fan, it would be the most delightful.
And yeah, I realize that I'm talking about what sounds like 'genfic' through and through-- but boy, do I wish one could write slashfic & hetfic like that, too. It's the (good) comics-writer's model, really-- take an existing canon, write new issues with the past events/characterizations/styles in mind (hopefully), but expand to include new pairings, new adventures, new angles... like a hidden secret passage. Suddenly you think, oh my god, what if JK Rowling meant for this to happen? I totally thought this with slash sometimes-- like with Miss Breed's `Red', and Aspen's writing (hahaha!!). So like, you could have tricksy subversion that works by popping up when you've already decided 'oh good, danger's past'. That'd be so cool.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 03:13 pm (UTC)Because on one hand, I'm very picky about characterization and on the other I'm not really picky about, say, writing style or atmosphere? And to some degree this may be a result of the subject matter I choose: there's more room for deviation in the 70's or with the adult generation than the trio's because we know less about them, and we can always say, well the 70's WERE dark, so maybe that darker tone is appropriate, or well, Harry's 15, so the atmosphere of the world seen through his eyes will always differ from the atmosphere seen through, say, Snape's.
And I think that's a big issue there, because if you're writing with a similar style or atmosphere to JKR's, and you're writing from Snape's POV, you're going to be writing OOC, really.
Which, I guess, is why I end up writing/reading stuff that, while characterized well and accurately, could never in a million years be mistaken for canon.
Does that make sense?
Anyway, so would it be the most delightful as a fan? I think it depends on what you're a fan OF, you know?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:00 pm (UTC)Like... most of the time, my replies to comments go like this: "but nooo, that's not what I meant...! It's the exact opposite with a secret twist at the end! Noooooooooo...." :> Le sigh. It's probably better to have more of a buffer between thought & writing/speech than I do :>
Which is to say-- I think I write even more than I think ;)) Ahahahahah. *coughs*
I feel I should catch you on AIM, then, though it seems like you use y!m instead (which if I'm ever on, I curse the universe 'cause EVERYONE IS INVISIBLE-- WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE??!)
Anyway, I'm about as lazy with that medium as most people are with 'formal' posts on lj. I dunno, it's that 'other people' thing, I think :> :> But now I'm all curious about those essays :D
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:22 pm (UTC)LMAO! Yes you are! Hehehe.
But yeah, the issue is that I'm hopelessly structured. I can't just talk about something like this, I'd have to make a point list or something, and that's just too much trouble. ;)
And yeah, I detest AIM with an all-consuming passion and Never, Ever, EVER go on it. Same with MSN. And I dunno why everyone else is always invis but I am because I don't like talking to people. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:29 pm (UTC)... But then, how do you like... actually talk to -anyone- on y!m? Of course, apparently lately there's been "only non-invisible to chosen users", I guess. I mean, I -might- possibly show up sometime, y'know (I'm people too, right). Eh, I'm never invisible, so it works out I suppose :>
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:36 pm (UTC)LMAO!!!!!! Well, Yahoo doesn't turn you uninvis if you talk to people. But honestly, the only person, the ONLY person I talk to is Lara. She's basically my reason for having an IM service to begin with.
Once a... YEAR or so I might talk to someone else, but I'm basically the most asocial person ever born, yes.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:41 pm (UTC)I mean, I'm asocial all right, just... once you get me started... I talk a lot. And by a lot I mean... a lot.
*sniff* Man, those legendary essays, so tantalizingly out of reach. *faraway dreamy look*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:57 pm (UTC)And I do talk a lot when I'm talking, but I don't do that much, except on Livejournal.
and HAHAHA dude, you don't wanna hear me pontificate, it's a freakish thing, and Lara sits there going "... yeah" a lot. :D
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 06:03 pm (UTC)I totally enjoy listening to people (that I like) pontificate-- saves -me- from having to, doesn't it :)) Or sometimes I pontificate right back, which could possibly be hazardous to someone's health.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 06:37 pm (UTC)I just don't want to be social, to be honest. So yeah, none of that. ;)
That thing about running out of stuff to say, though... might be something to that, because I think I'm kind of out of words right now hahah!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:15 pm (UTC)Perhaps I'm er... an odd duck. No, almost certainly.
And I wasn't meaning to stress writing style so much-- I mean, I don't even -want- to see JKR-style writing 'cause she doesn't really have a great style to start with (...er). I'd be more going for 'feel' and 'direction' which is even harder to quantify. 'Spirit'??? I think one can approach the same spirit with many different words & paths and things. I mean, that's the founding rule of fanfic, isn't it? Or something.
I'm not really picky about atmosphere with HP, but I really really am when I actually care about and love the source. I mean, in that case I end up reading virtually no fanfic, but if I ever do come across something that works for me and gives me that feeling of 'hi honey! I'm home!!'... oh man, the happy :D
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 04:36 pm (UTC)Yeah, see, things like the feel of something? That's pretty much too abstract for me to worry about, which is why I say I'm a fan of characterization or plot or whatever. I usually don't really register the atmosphere etc: my biggest comment on the HP series' is "kinda too simplistic for me, actually."
And yet, I can understand what you mean because I have the same reaction, oddly enough, with characters. Like, someone can write Sirius very differently than I see him, for example, and yet I will still believe that This Is Sirius because he retains the Spirit of Sirius. Alternately, people can write Siriuses who seem to go through a checklist of things I like in a Sirius, and yet seem off because he doesn't feel like Sirius. Yeah. Subjective, but there you go.
I'm not a big fan of fanfic, really, but yeah if I really love something I pretty much read NO fanfic. It seems sacrilegious. Or something.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:07 pm (UTC)Anyway, yeah-- that's my favorite sensation in reading fanfic, prolly-- that feeling of yeah, that's it, whether in terms of characterization or mood or setting or anything-- as long as some strong whiff of intuitive rightness exists, all is-- well, right with the world :> I get this the most with Harry, btw (ahahah we are both kind of transparent in that regard, what with the playing favorites & obsession = attention & so on).
Like, as Cassie was saying below-- that no one has written a 100% believable 'feeling' fanfic-- I'd have to say that it doesn't need to be believable all the way if that spirit of at least One True Thing is there. I mean, Harry is my One True Thing (aka measuring stick), but, y'know, different strokes, etc.
I tend to read no fanfic for my favorite things too-- no one's good enough for my babies, etc. It's just my experience with collaborative worlds (like comics & some series of short-story collections) that made me open to possibility.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:32 pm (UTC)Sirius is my favorite character, but he isn't my yardstick or anything. So yeah.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 05:57 pm (UTC)I think what I meant was that I had those moments of 'yes! hey, that's Harry!' with Harry but not with Harry/Draco as a unit. Much as I'd like to :>
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 06:16 pm (UTC)Whereas with something like R/S, which is present in canon (not necessarily in a romantic sense, but you get a feel for their dynamic, know what I mean?) someone like me will try to find a way of presenting them romantically that replicates the dynamic they already have.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 06:20 pm (UTC)...And then I remember there really isn't any more IC S/R fic than H/D fic ;))!!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-09 06:32 pm (UTC)Yeah, funny isn't it?