!!!

[reenka]

Ron is Dumbledore.

Holy crap, holy crap, holy -crap-!!

If he isn't, there had best be some fancy footwork by JKR, what with all this stacked up in the favor of that (admittedly nutty-sounding) idea. When I first saw the kicker in ixchelmala & lizardlaugh's theory, I was like, "!!! ...no" of course. But.

Now all I can think of is Ron's broken wand in CoS, and what a sadly underdeveloped unserious typical-boy wizard he is, and how quietly jealous he is of others' abilities and fame and so on, how overshadowed he feels by his brothers. Poor Ron, right, always in the sidelines.

It would be perfect. PERFECT. If Ron turned out to... well... be the greatest (and least serious!) wizard alive (even though the time-travel idea still hurts my head).

God, I love him. My mind is completely blown. Completely. I never read all the silly canon-predicting theories. I mean. Who cares, really. I'm not a plot-obsessed person, anyway, more into characterization. But. This has such -huge- consequences for characterization. It blows my mind.

Holy crap. Dumbledore really did refer to their relationship in the past tense in OoTP. "Had ever been", indeed. Gah. It was this that really clinched it for me. How else could you explain that? I just want to see someone explain that some other way, man. 'Cause otherwise-- DUDE. RON! If it's not true, it should be.

I always thought that Dumbledore's love for Harry was a little... much. Like. Why does he love him so much? Why? HOLY CRAP. And Dumbledore sees himself holding a pair of socks in Erised, and if socks symbolize mother-love, wah!! Omg. He-- omg, he must really have missed his mother. :((

Comments

[ljash.livejournal.com]

ha. HA. Ok. That sorta blew my mind as well. I mean, there's no way in hell it can be true but, wow. There was a lot of evidence that made some kind of sense in there. There was a lot that seemed like a stretch, too. I'm not sure what to make of the "has ever been" but it seems like there could be various interpretations. I thought he was saying that if V. finds out they were close, or had ever been close, then Harry was in greater danger. But in retrospect that doesn't make complete sense.

hee... this is very strange. Now I kinda want to reread them, too, and try to force this interpretation and see what happens. When I have the time I think I might do this.

The sock thing was odd. All I could think of was "Dark Side of Light" and I'm having difficulty getting back on track. Also, I glanced at the linked essay and it seemed to have no basis in reality. But there are a lot of socks floating around in that story, I do have to agree with that point.

hee. This is just insane. I'll have to reread it when I'm more awake.

[yourpoison.livejournal.com]

In the end, what I come away with (the moral, you might say), pretty much has to do with the socks. Socks are important. That's pretty much it :D :D!

I'm kind of embarrassed now. It was like the flu-- it came, it went. It got me to remember how much I love Ron. I really love Ron and Harry and Draco (and sometimes Sirius and Remus, also), a ridiculous amount. For some reason I can't love Hermione, because she just seems so... prickly and stiff. Hee. Well, Draco is prickly & stiff too, but in a cute way, like, he'd growl and slash at you, but he really wants it bad, you know he does.

I kind of dig Hermione when I'm channeling Ron though. Heh. In the end, I just want Ron to kick ass, Harry to laugh, and Draco to get really well fucked *coughs* I mean... um....

And Draco... I want Draco to have his whole being kind of put through the meat-grinder of life. And also to realize that he really does want Potter, and watch his little mind disintegrate from the knowledge.
Oh wait, I said I loved him -.-
I don't have the sweetest, kindest impulses towards Draco, I guess. I want him to have some sort of trial by fire. And then sex. Yes, that would be good~:))

[ljash.livejournal.com]

heeeheeeheeee....

You do know that we're all fucked when the 6th book finally comes out and we have to attempt to understand it, right?