reenka: (Default)
[personal profile] reenka
well, people seem to like my fluff-- or not even -my- fluff-- let's just say, people seem to like fluff, unless they're grumpy people and go "arg" and "grr" a lot. as in, "grrr, i only like Deep Poetic Torture" *laughs madly*
god, i amuse myself.
onwards.

so i know [livejournal.com profile] ashkitty wants me to write more fluff-- and i want -other- people to write more fluff (ie, pretty much all of you). this gives me an idea. for a fic challenge. to write a fluff fic based on a type of sweet. like, it would have the properties of that sweet-- apple cobbler with ice cream, or blueberry tart, or coffee ice-cream with mint chips, or cookies-and-cream, or strawberries-with-chocolate-sauce...mmmmm :D no one ever picks up on my challenges, so i guess i'll have all these sweets rotting my own brain. ha. eventually i might eat one, though~:) mmm, lemon-chiffon pie..... triple-chocolate decadence....a strawberry milkshake.... a triple-decker sundae... *stops herself forcefully* :>

anyway-- i would write one, if someone else picked another one. fic for fic. they could be connected, but they don't have to be. the fic doesn't have to have a sweet in it, just have the properties of that sweet-- ie, structurally, emotionally, sensually. so that the fic tastes like the confection, somehow. just, whatever your favorite sweet is, try to translate that -feeling- into a fic. is that possible? i don't know. but it'd be fun to try, i think.
    EDIT: all the fluff-challenged people can of course feel free to write about yummy smooth, rich darkness-- let's say, chocolate mousse, brandy-flavored chocolate-covered cherries, bitter dark chocolate candy with crunchy hazelnut centers, even chocolate liquor~:) mmm, that last one has got to be poisonously orgasmic, all smooth and deadly and irresistible. mmmmmmmmm....

~~
[livejournal.com profile] pingviini wrote pure sweet goodness, again. *sigh* romantic!draco meets philosophic!harry in an amphitheatre. whispers carry.

Date: 2002-10-17 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lasultrix.livejournal.com
Cool idea! I would, but I just can't write fluff. The closest I come to fluff is the Fleur/Cho in VM, which considering their mental states is not very fluffy at all at all.

Date: 2002-10-17 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
*laffs* fleur/cho is to fluff what pickles are to deli sandwiches. a contrast :D heh.

i thought the h/d was almost sort of fluffy, but then, i think them fighting and draco's jealousy is just adorable-- admittedly, there might be something wrong with that view, but still. pouty!draco, you know he's fluffy even though he's pretending otherwise. maybe it's because he reminds me of a pre-adolescent so much. grown-up!draco never did it for me, really. i mean, if you take away his pathetic-git quality and the adorable arrogance wedded to it, and all the snark-- it's not as adorable on grown-ups. unless they're english, and hugh grant :D ha.

anyway. i've amended the fic-idea, so now it includes bitter and alcoholic and intoxicatingly bittersweet, and so on. i'll write the review, i will, but this (http://www.core.binghamton.edu/~lorien/story/hpics/fleur.jpg), i wanted to show you first, anyway. i doodled fleur on my print-out of `veela magic' and while i didn't have her in mind while doodling, she kind of looks fleur-like, and she's definitely yours because i never read fleur-fic before and i haven't red the last 3 books (yet) either :D

*bounces* she looks kinda evil, but i think she's supposed to. i don't have much loff for fleur yet, though i like fleur/cho and their characterizations, just-- fleur-- let's just say she's not as endearing as she could be ^^

not like poor widdle drakey :D *laughs* it's hard to laugh at her, i mean. though i can -always- laugh at draco. it's a talent :D

~reena

Date: 2002-10-18 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lasultrix.livejournal.com
*weeps* It's lovely! It is Fleur-like, but Fleur when she's twisted with anger, not when she's putting the perfect seduction on. Maybe Fleur as Cho sees her, when Fleur lets her guard down and allows herself to be angry about Gabrielle?

Hang on... you've only read PS? But... how?

Date: 2002-10-18 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
hee~! is it that i don't seem like the sinner type...? mostly because i have no patience for jkr's writing or her plots or her characterizations. it's readable once you start, definitely, but i have to remind myself and force myself to begin. it's still on my "to-do" list, but it was mostly important back when i was going to write my Epic... and now that that's on the back-burner... well. i would never read it if no to become a "better fan" or more like, better fanfic writer.

i just don't enjoy it in a visceral way like i do other books. say, diana wynne jones-- i couldn't put her down, not ever. it might be because i basically know the plot of all of them, so i'm just reading them for details, like a duty almost. taken on its own terms, without having fallen in love with the -idea- of the world and the characters already beforehand, i would say i actively dislike jkr's work. she can be witty and whimsical, but her plot-- her characterization-- the overabundance of sloppy writing and the execution in general-- are way below my standard.

should probably read CoS before i see the movie, though ^^; hee

~reena

Date: 2002-10-19 02:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lasultrix.livejournal.com
But how do you know the canon, if you've only read one book? How do you get any feel for post-PS characters? *puzzlement*

Date: 2002-10-19 12:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
yeah, that's odd, isn't it?
one answer is that i -don't- have a feel for say, sirius or remus, but on the other hand, from all reports (and i had my het!boy friend read all the books, and he's become my canon beta, hehee), sirius doesn't get much in-depth characterization in the books, anyway.

i dunno, i never claimed to know canon!harry or canon!draco -that- much. the fact that people say i write even remotely canonical stuff is amusing, i guess. i've heard enough things about canon characterizations, i've read enough to know how she writes, and i pick up things from fanon. i'm observant...? i dunno. i do have this sense that maybe i'm missing something important-- ie, with ginny or seamus or whoever, but then again i'm not that interested in them. i do believe i could greatly enlarge my scope if/when i finish the books (i -will-), but it just doesn't feel urgent, since it's mostly to improve my writing.

but yah, for some reason i can tell what's canon and what's not. weird, huh? :)

Profile

reenka: (Default)
reenka

October 2007

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
1415161718 19 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 05:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios