I think I'm experiencing a resurgence of... something. Or other. Fandomy. I blame MsScribe!!1 >:O!!
But anyway, I think
furiosity's Don't Like? Don't Read! a Tragedie in Five Acts pretty much sums up my life in fandom :D :D Hahaha, I too was Ms Gentle Reader once upon a time. And then I read too many questionable fics of the same questionably plausible pairing for a questionably long time, 'tis true. *wibble*
What I wanted to say was-- though I have no problem with headers/warnings etc. in theory, I've never seen them as useful in the 'don't like, don't read' fangirl philosophy of avoiding fics I wouldn't like...
Sometimes (if I trust the source), I've enjoyed pairings that make no sense in theory and which I would've avoided, normally, based on warning alone (like Draco/Dumbledore) or scenarios I generally find squicky (like Lucius/Draco chan). Basically, what warnings don't address (beyond the obvious usefulness of pairing labels for shippers) is the question of quality, which is overriding in terms of what makes a fic readable. Not only that, even given pure writing quality, it doesn't address fanon characterization issues-- I mean, even if you did warn for fanon!Draco, say, it would depend on the author as to what that means in practice. (Meaning, very different characterizations are still fanon stereotypes, some more palatable than others to a particular reader.)
I think for some people, it -would- be enough to know a fic doesn't include their worst squicks (like, for me it would be deathfic & rapefic + ice-prince!Draco) and/or included their biggest kinks (for me it'd probably be stuff no one ever warns for, like snark & cute plot-devices like detentions or potions and such). Myself, I'd just be a lot more careful with stuff that really squicks me, as in, I'm less likely to trust an author I don't know, and more likely if the unknown wrote a favorite cliche of mine, like Harry & Draco need to fuck or the world will END (no one does that anymore, man). I mean, to me, my squicks are really a fuzzy line, 'cause many of the best H/D fics have included death, like Olympia's and Amalin's and Maya's, and a lot of the sexiest scenes for me walk the edge of consent (and it's really a toss up whether you could call it rape from another person's pov).
(And need I even say that ice-prince!Draco is in nearly all the well-written/classic H/D I myself loved?)
More detailed things like reviews aren't reliable either, 'cause so much depends on a reviewer's individual bias. Just yesterday, I came across a glowing review of a popular fic I absolutely hate, written by an apparently intelligent reader in articulate terms. If anything, often the more 'intelligent' and articulate reviewers seem to go easier on fics than I do 'cause they focus more on the writing itself & less on canonical plausibility or stuff that's particular to a ship (like, how a particular fic reflects or comments on the ship, which always concerns me).
So basically I don't care about the things people warn for one way or another (like I've never read a fic I'd say had a true Mary Sue, no matter how white-washed Draco gets), and never get warnings for what really annoys me (like flowery writing, stupid fanon excuses, shmoopy sex, Sex God!Draco, etc). Possibly warnings are meant for more 'standard' readers... whatever -those- are. I don't know, really. Are there really People Who'll Read Anything Well-written or People Who Read For Kink & that's it?
~~
So many people hatin' on H/D fanon cliches here made me a happy, happy (less alone!) fanpoodle! :X!
But anyway, I think
What I wanted to say was-- though I have no problem with headers/warnings etc. in theory, I've never seen them as useful in the 'don't like, don't read' fangirl philosophy of avoiding fics I wouldn't like...
Sometimes (if I trust the source), I've enjoyed pairings that make no sense in theory and which I would've avoided, normally, based on warning alone (like Draco/Dumbledore) or scenarios I generally find squicky (like Lucius/Draco chan). Basically, what warnings don't address (beyond the obvious usefulness of pairing labels for shippers) is the question of quality, which is overriding in terms of what makes a fic readable. Not only that, even given pure writing quality, it doesn't address fanon characterization issues-- I mean, even if you did warn for fanon!Draco, say, it would depend on the author as to what that means in practice. (Meaning, very different characterizations are still fanon stereotypes, some more palatable than others to a particular reader.)
I think for some people, it -would- be enough to know a fic doesn't include their worst squicks (like, for me it would be deathfic & rapefic + ice-prince!Draco) and/or included their biggest kinks (for me it'd probably be stuff no one ever warns for, like snark & cute plot-devices like detentions or potions and such). Myself, I'd just be a lot more careful with stuff that really squicks me, as in, I'm less likely to trust an author I don't know, and more likely if the unknown wrote a favorite cliche of mine, like Harry & Draco need to fuck or the world will END (no one does that anymore, man). I mean, to me, my squicks are really a fuzzy line, 'cause many of the best H/D fics have included death, like Olympia's and Amalin's and Maya's, and a lot of the sexiest scenes for me walk the edge of consent (and it's really a toss up whether you could call it rape from another person's pov).
(And need I even say that ice-prince!Draco is in nearly all the well-written/classic H/D I myself loved?)
More detailed things like reviews aren't reliable either, 'cause so much depends on a reviewer's individual bias. Just yesterday, I came across a glowing review of a popular fic I absolutely hate, written by an apparently intelligent reader in articulate terms. If anything, often the more 'intelligent' and articulate reviewers seem to go easier on fics than I do 'cause they focus more on the writing itself & less on canonical plausibility or stuff that's particular to a ship (like, how a particular fic reflects or comments on the ship, which always concerns me).
So basically I don't care about the things people warn for one way or another (like I've never read a fic I'd say had a true Mary Sue, no matter how white-washed Draco gets), and never get warnings for what really annoys me (like flowery writing, stupid fanon excuses, shmoopy sex, Sex God!Draco, etc). Possibly warnings are meant for more 'standard' readers... whatever -those- are. I don't know, really. Are there really People Who'll Read Anything Well-written or People Who Read For Kink & that's it?
~~
So many people hatin' on H/D fanon cliches here made me a happy, happy (less alone!) fanpoodle! :X!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 10:14 pm (UTC)Okay, forum here. I've read all this fics.
I read Origins at a very good time, because I was just into fandom, just into slash, and just into H/D. It really gelled with me. It was the first really full-on sex I'd ever read, too, which helped. At the time, the really big iffy thing was the godammn lists of smells. Everyone smelled of about ten thousand different things.
Maya's faith in all her characters is very clear, I see what you mean. Me, I'd write something one way to help the plot along but I don't really believe a word of it. That may be the main difference between she and I. :)
I don't think I finished Shadow because ... well, put it this way, I can't even remember what happened in it. Was it the one with the tents? Out of all of them though, I think I liked Transfig least. It wasn't Draco, because I could sorta buy that interpretation -- I just thought the author was a bit lazy and didn't want to make him as wanky as he really is, which is fine. Most people don't bother. It was Harry's characterisation I didn't like in that one. It all seemed so overplayed, that fic. I got to the end and just went 'Oh. Well.'
Then again, so few fics move me a lot these days. Left My Heart was okay, but I hated Hermione's children's names; I didn't fancy the sex scenes in ATBT. Then again, since Underwater Light, I've never expected to be wowed by anything. Even rereading that is a bit disappointing. The writing is still good, but my perception of it has changed.
So, like I say, I read for the sake of it now. I never felt as strongly about getting the characterisation 'IC' as you or Furiosity -- I just wanted to believe it. It takes very little to get me to believe. Hell, I was even stuck on that one where Draco skies and they get dressed up in period costume to go to Austenish dances -- what was it called? Meh. I don't know what else to say but that the power of someone's writing and their own belief in 'this is how it should go' are really the only things that count, in the end.
And also, you don't need a reason to hate something, same as you don't need a reason to like it!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 10:32 pm (UTC)Um. Where was I...
Yes. I can actually see the over-the-topness of the Harry in Transfig, but taken in context-- he was grumpy and broody and whiny & resentful when most people were writing him all uber-adjusted & ridiculously forgiving and stuff. No one made him grumpy. It was really annoying. And then Resonant came along :))
And! See, I know I don't -need- reasons, I just -have- them, really. It's not even that I'm so ICness-obsessed like furiosity, I just... I have pet peeves. A lot of them. And bland, smooth-operator, sensible & unruffled Dracos like in ATBT and Shadow... it's... it's sort of like watching a bad remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers over and over again. And the sex in ATBT really -was- bad (I skipped to the end! Have only actually read a chapter). I didn't even read -that- much of Shadow, just saw how horrid its Draco was at first glance & could tell where it was going with the H/D (Harry's just so... starry-eyed and Draco's so cool-mysterious-Slytherin-sex-machine I want to HIT something... repeatedly).
I may remember the Austenish dances, but it's a reflection on H/D fandom that there are several like that. One is 'Facade', I believe, which I barely skimmed because it's worse than a Harlequin, and another is a rewrite of an Austen novel, I forget which one. Uh. I sorta liked that one, but then I sorta liked a lot of things when I first came to fandom. And! If just liking ICness was enough, I'd probably like furiosity's fics more than I do. Though I still like them more than ATBT, but then no fic gets me riled up like that one so I shouldn't compare... ^^;; I actually really like it when she does angry!dom-Harry!and-violent-sex!H/D... :>
no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-03 11:22 pm (UTC)I think Durendal continued that fic, actually! Though I don't think it was as good, so maybe it's almost better that she didn't? Er. But. I just really like her style of humor ^^;; I'm helpless before her. It's sad :/ I don't think most parody works for me either if it's stuff like Little Britain, but Durendal's stuff never came across that way-- it's more... sekritly serious??! I dunno, it's got that undercurrent of seriousness in there, which can be as interesting as serious-fic-that's-funny. I think when you're seriously funny (ummm) you can't help but touch upon 'real' issues, or something, y'know? Whereas compared to that, parody is shallow because it doesn't have its -own- content or something ^^;;
Oh, I don't find ATBT 'terribly bad', I just hate the Draco characterization (in the first chapter... which is all I read, but). It's all in what you focus on, I suppose :> I'm totally unaware of anything longish
...it's true that F's aren't always IC, but she usually labels the crack :))
In terms of blanking out flaws... I think there are short fics that are absolutely brilliant enough to blank out any flaws-- I mean, biased as I am, etc. Like,
no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:51 pm (UTC)Amalin, Amalin. You mention her a lot. Is she gone from fandom?
"Your Every Desire" chilled me to the bone. I still have nightmares about it. Me, I am not a horror and gore sort of girl. I like romcoms. But still, I'm glad I read that one.
Must check that one out ...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:11 pm (UTC)But yeah, 'Your Every Desire' is scary as fuck. Hard to find a flaw in it other than that though, isn't it :> :>
You should also read 'Red (http://bloom.velveteen.net/red.html)' by Miss Breed, or that wanking fic that's also on her site, though the wankfic is less with the classic!H/D and more with the IC wanking. Heh. Amalin... yeah, was like one of the first 5 H/D writers I found, and there's a list of her stuff here (http://monochromal.livejournal.com/67726.html), though most of what -I- read, she links at the bottom at her website. I dunno how it holds up characterization-wise (her longfic-- the one at the top-- that one does, but the other old H/D ficlets are just REALLY well-written. uh. *cough*)
I'm really a style-whore who got burned too many times :/
no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:17 pm (UTC)Very hard. Very very hard.
Ah yes, monochromal! I remember her very last longfic coming out (I did not read it). I'm a bit bored with the H/D dynamic nowadays, frankly. Everyone is so keen to write worthy, non leather pants wearing or sex gods that ... well ... it's a bit dull.
Or maybe I just want more spin the bottle fics. I think they're so cute.
Hehehe. (I don't know why that's funny.)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:27 pm (UTC)...See, see, people TRY to be better but really they just get worse :/ Like, seriously, they may talk the talk (and they don't really talk -my- talk anyway), but no one walks the walk. HBP isn't the best soil for cute H/D, but then no one agreed with me about the wonderousness about OoTP!H/D anyway... but yes. Aspen & Sara/
no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:34 pm (UTC)Probably in some grotty little newsagents, but I digress.
Really, I just wish
no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-04 10:58 pm (UTC)