![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
reenkaI think I'm sort of chagrined-- or ashamed-- or something, that I really let this sort of thing get to me:
The manga isn't really "yaoi," as other reviewers have mentioned; it focuses more on the characters' feelings and struggles rather than sex. So if you're looking for mindless sex, look elsewhere.
Le sigh. See, I don't even care what the person's opinion is or whatever, and I'm not that invested that particular manga, either, but just-- well, they're incorrect about the definition of yaoi (ie, it having to be 'mindless sex'), and even so it's not like they said 'well, it's shounen ai rather than yaoi' or whatever. Arg. It's like, what, is it not too gay for you?? I know, I know I'm overreacting but I hate having that knee-jerk desire to 're-educate' people. I think it's like, well, not important how well-versed they are in the jargon of the genre if they're not too into it and/or aren't really big fans, but at the same time it's so offensive when someone doesn't know what they're talking about and comes off like a total ass because they think they do. -.- I mean, not that you have to always know (I certainly don't), but at least don't spread misinformation -.-
What bothers me even more is my immediate suspicion that the only reason a person would -have- such a misconception is that they just don't -care- to know any better, so if I or someone else ever bothered correcting them they would either a) ignore it or b) insist they're right.
Of course, I could write a whole essay about what bothers me about that small little statement, like the implication that sex is bad, like the implication that too much -gay- sex is 'mindless' as well as bad, like the implication that yaoi sucks (because of sex? or gayness? or both?) and because of the general moronic ignorance being on display. And yet, I mean, I really shouldn't bother with this or the million things like it I come across-- there's too many offenders to waste my time & energy on, but. I think it's just hard to reconcile myself with the sheer futility of expecting people to care enough to research the things they get interested in and to get the 'real facts' before they spew bullshit.
Maybe the bottom line is that I always need something to be bitter and/or excited about, and. I really need to get a life. That's what it all comes down to, right :> That said, I can't resist the fantasies of smacking people every time someone utters the words 'mindless' and 'sex' as if they were born to go together. I'm really hopeless -.-
Actually, to make myself feel better, I found a link for different types of generalization fallacies, here. Yes Reena, escape into utter academic bullshit rhetoric, escape! Escape! ^^;;;
The manga isn't really "yaoi," as other reviewers have mentioned; it focuses more on the characters' feelings and struggles rather than sex. So if you're looking for mindless sex, look elsewhere.
Le sigh. See, I don't even care what the person's opinion is or whatever, and I'm not that invested that particular manga, either, but just-- well, they're incorrect about the definition of yaoi (ie, it having to be 'mindless sex'), and even so it's not like they said 'well, it's shounen ai rather than yaoi' or whatever. Arg. It's like, what, is it not too gay for you?? I know, I know I'm overreacting but I hate having that knee-jerk desire to 're-educate' people. I think it's like, well, not important how well-versed they are in the jargon of the genre if they're not too into it and/or aren't really big fans, but at the same time it's so offensive when someone doesn't know what they're talking about and comes off like a total ass because they think they do. -.- I mean, not that you have to always know (I certainly don't), but at least don't spread misinformation -.-
What bothers me even more is my immediate suspicion that the only reason a person would -have- such a misconception is that they just don't -care- to know any better, so if I or someone else ever bothered correcting them they would either a) ignore it or b) insist they're right.
Of course, I could write a whole essay about what bothers me about that small little statement, like the implication that sex is bad, like the implication that too much -gay- sex is 'mindless' as well as bad, like the implication that yaoi sucks (because of sex? or gayness? or both?) and because of the general moronic ignorance being on display. And yet, I mean, I really shouldn't bother with this or the million things like it I come across-- there's too many offenders to waste my time & energy on, but. I think it's just hard to reconcile myself with the sheer futility of expecting people to care enough to research the things they get interested in and to get the 'real facts' before they spew bullshit.
Maybe the bottom line is that I always need something to be bitter and/or excited about, and. I really need to get a life. That's what it all comes down to, right :> That said, I can't resist the fantasies of smacking people every time someone utters the words 'mindless' and 'sex' as if they were born to go together. I'm really hopeless -.-
Actually, to make myself feel better, I found a link for different types of generalization fallacies, here. Yes Reena, escape into utter academic bullshit rhetoric, escape! Escape! ^^;;;
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
being anal
Date: 2005-12-08 05:30 am (UTC)Aestheticism glossary and prob-needs-to-be-updated-again boys love terms
Then again, terms change and muddy all the time, not even counting when another country steals it. No one remembers that a drabble is supposedly exactly 100 words etc etc...
Re: being anal
Date: 2005-12-08 07:43 am (UTC)Anyway, er, there's no way I'd be that bothered by terminology in itself. I'm not -that- anal, ahahah ^^;;;