[duh. -.-]
Jul. 20th, 2006 10:22 pmI read
dorrie6's comment on Sister M's post on Harry-bias in canon about how Draco's understandable and could be made plenty sympathetic in fanfic without white-washing his choices and experiences/beliefs (or making him a pathetic whiney baby or boring and uptight or too serious or... *grumblegrumble*), and I was like YES! and I AM NOT ALONE, I KNOW THAT! and SO WHY ARE THINGS THE WAY THEY ARE??!? and why do people say this on a canon post and only argue till they're blue in the face on most fanon posts.... I just realized: it's because these issues themselves (including my reaction!) aren't really analytically based. I really can't sit there and go, 'okay, so I was thinking about this and it's not like I'm about to scream in frustration or anything... um....'
I mean, we may love the HP books, yes, but we can (sometimes) discuss them calmly 'cause we're not -as- invested as we are in our work or that of our friends or y'know, "our" porn and reading kinks or whatever. That's the bottom line, probably; bigtime fans don't like it when you diss HP (unless it's v. subtle/intellectual and goes over their heads), but they'd probably like it even less if you said their favorite porny fun-fun-happy-time fic sucked & was lazy & OOC. :/ It's hard to say 'this sort of fic SUCKS ASS' in a subtle & intellectual way, I guess :>
(And it actually never ceases to amuse me that as an actual reviewer, I'm a total verbose squee-monkey and never snark or say snide things... I love fanfic not because I'm so critical/analytical but because I'm just IN LOVE so I notice tons of bad -and- good things the way girls obsess over their butts and notice that light pink rash on the far-off fold of their left buttock...)
So no one says it unless they want to whine, don't care about stirring up shit or are somehow untouchable in fandom. But yes, regardless: point is, it's fic so it's about passion whereas discussing canon can easily-- and is easily-- made purely intellectual in fandom (when it's not a jizz-bottle of pure wank).DAMN IT ALL TO HELL ANYWAY.
The sad sad truth is, I'm probably more -attracted- to fanfic meta than canon meta because it's more emotionally meaty and volatile as a subject in the first place, because it's more -fun- since it's tapping into my creative self, my dreaming self, my wanting-fun-fun-happy-porn self. Canon, to me, is just like 'oh, that's interesting... oooh, I LOVE Harry... oooh, Draco... huh... wow, Snape sure is fascinating, I wonder what's going on... tralala... oh look, it's a zombie!!' -.- Oh, self. *groan*
PS. I don't mean I like fanon more than canon, I really do just mean I like fanfic more, which is a subtle difference but it's there. Or perhaps I should say I'm v. picky about what sorts of fanon I like & how they relate to canon?? I like a certain kind/flow of canon/fanon relationship, because to me it really is all about relationships between things and never 'the thing alone', which is why I secretly would want most canon meta to be more fanony and of COURSE I want all fanon meta to be canony(!), and I don't just mean romantic relationships, btw. :P
I mean, we may love the HP books, yes, but we can (sometimes) discuss them calmly 'cause we're not -as- invested as we are in our work or that of our friends or y'know, "our" porn and reading kinks or whatever. That's the bottom line, probably; bigtime fans don't like it when you diss HP (unless it's v. subtle/intellectual and goes over their heads), but they'd probably like it even less if you said their favorite porny fun-fun-happy-time fic sucked & was lazy & OOC. :/ It's hard to say 'this sort of fic SUCKS ASS' in a subtle & intellectual way, I guess :>
(And it actually never ceases to amuse me that as an actual reviewer, I'm a total verbose squee-monkey and never snark or say snide things... I love fanfic not because I'm so critical/analytical but because I'm just IN LOVE so I notice tons of bad -and- good things the way girls obsess over their butts and notice that light pink rash on the far-off fold of their left buttock...)
So no one says it unless they want to whine, don't care about stirring up shit or are somehow untouchable in fandom. But yes, regardless: point is, it's fic so it's about passion whereas discussing canon can easily-- and is easily-- made purely intellectual in fandom (when it's not a jizz-bottle of pure wank).
The sad sad truth is, I'm probably more -attracted- to fanfic meta than canon meta because it's more emotionally meaty and volatile as a subject in the first place, because it's more -fun- since it's tapping into my creative self, my dreaming self, my wanting-fun-fun-happy-porn self. Canon, to me, is just like 'oh, that's interesting... oooh, I LOVE Harry... oooh, Draco... huh... wow, Snape sure is fascinating, I wonder what's going on... tralala... oh look, it's a zombie!!' -.- Oh, self. *groan*
PS. I don't mean I like fanon more than canon, I really do just mean I like fanfic more, which is a subtle difference but it's there. Or perhaps I should say I'm v. picky about what sorts of fanon I like & how they relate to canon?? I like a certain kind/flow of canon/fanon relationship, because to me it really is all about relationships between things and never 'the thing alone', which is why I secretly would want most canon meta to be more fanony and of COURSE I want all fanon meta to be canony(!), and I don't just mean romantic relationships, btw. :P
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 01:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:13 pm (UTC)I think what you said and having already formed opinions is v. important to how one reacts, though. I'd already formed my opinions by OoTP, and the fifth book itself was what cemented them-- to the point where it was difficult (next to impossible) for me to 'recover' and shift my perception of H/D with new -canon- the way I should have with HBP, forget new -fanon-! :D But while my perceptions were still forming post-GoF, I was fine with all sorts of crazy things... I mean, I always wanted things to be well-written, but I suspect rereading LuW now, for instance, would just make me laugh :>
I do think if you rant about specific ideas in characterization, it's not as bad as pointing at fics! A lot of times people don't recognize themselves in putting forth 'that' characterization, anyway-- it's always 'those other people' :> Like, few enough people are self-aware about what/how they write the characters as, which is actually one of the reasons they write them out of character, I think! :)
I think a civil discussion may be more likely if you flocked/filtered (just to get it off your chest may help, even if the audience shrunk), though I'd be sad never to see it :>
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:39 pm (UTC)More and more, I think I'm going to make a post. Probably it will be public. Er. Maybe. Probably.
You know, it's interesting, though, I haven't had any difficulty adjusting to new canon, but maybe that's because it matches so closely to what my own personal fanon was before HBP came out.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:01 pm (UTC)Me, I don't know what my current tastes are. The only fic that -really- worked for me post-HBP was
What I meant by 'having trouble processing canon' isn't that HBP wasn't in my groove or contradicted my personal fanon but rather that it -fulfilled- my personal fanon & I don't know how to go -beyond- it. On the one hand, I know Harry hadn't fully 'seen' Draco yet, but on the other hand, characterizations themselves aside, Draco's shift in priorities makes it hard for me to write him as Harry-obsessed and angry/needy as I used to, and I'm unwilling/unable to make Harry take up the obsessive slack. So it's really an odd mix of having what I wanted happen & yet being stumped because I have no clue where I'd want to take it from here & feeling like I'd be okay with whatever JKR does :>
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:06 pm (UTC)I'll check out that fic you mentioned. I would love to really like something again.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-27 02:02 am (UTC)