[hero/shadow = still #1 OTP. le sigh]
Jan. 23rd, 2006 03:28 amI've just finished 'Wolfskin' by Juliet Marillier, and while it's interesting and I like the main characters (one of which is the Plucky and Strong Yet Fragile and Feminine Heroine), I can't help it... the most intriguing part of the book is the bond between the straightforward, kind yet quick-to-anger warrior boy and the snarky, cunning, needy, lonely yet ruthless sociopathic boy whom he shared a blood-oath of friendship with during their childhood. Mmmm. The warrior-boy's denseness and simplicity and loyalty set against the other's insecurity and need to prove himself and sheer single-minded desire to get what he -wants-... oh, it's like music to my ears.... And yes, I admit, in its basest elements it's really proto!H/D to me.
And much as I understand these two are 'straight' both by author intent and common sense in context of their times and history, I can't help it-- I can't help but feel -this- is the more striking love-story, no matter how honestly heterosexual the warrior boy may be. This is the archetypal relationship between Hero and Shadow, and to me, nothing could really equal it in meaning or intensity, since it represents the basic union of Light and Dark of everyone's nature.
It occurred to me that the reason I'm so very fascinated strikes to the very heart of the reason of why I slash, why close male friendship means so much to me-- and the emotional stuntedness and closed-in inability of the latter boy to communicate his real self sort of underlines the 'normal' situation. It's almost like-- almost like -all- boys are a little sociopathic compared to ourselves (the girls, I mean); it's like they're often this closed in and verbally eloquent about everything but what lies in their hearts, so scared and insecure and ruthless in their defensiveness.
It also reminded me of the exchange I recently had with
fictualities about being able to see the surviving 'half' of a pairing happy after the 'end'-- in a situation like with Frodo and Sam, where Frodo had little left to give before he'd finally departed and Sam had his wife and children. In my natural inclination, I'd say 'settling' is bad, even if the person is unaware they're settling for something 'lesser' or not as intense and deeply vital. I'd rather a character be miserable with the one they can't bear to love or lose than content with the one who merely makes them uncomplicatedly happy. But then, I'm rather perverse. -.-
I was thinking (with some chagrin), of how friends normally tend to make you uncomplicatedly happy, especially female friends (in my experience). If a friend isn't monumentally messed up, your relationship isn't likely to be fraught or angsty in terms of betrayals and secrets and overall tragedy, though clearly misunderstandings and resentments are normal. Uh, this is all 'in my experience'. And so, perhaps this is only the life of a relatively tame, easy-going female like myself-- men are much more likely to hold things back, to be eaten up by ambition and divided loyalties and duties, to be rotted from the inside with feelings they simply -can't- express, to be-- emotional basketcases, basically. And of course... of course, that's why I love them.
More to the point, that's why I love to slash them, leaving aside the hot boysex for a sec.
I can't really imagine a healthy relationship here, and can't guarantee this rift in the boy's soul can be mended with the love and faith another clueless boy can offer, but oh-- oh-- the very idea. The possibility. It is like the dream of somehow bridging the gulf between Self and Other; more desperate and dark than any mere love-story, but also more painfully close to the heart, perhaps.
And much as I understand these two are 'straight' both by author intent and common sense in context of their times and history, I can't help it-- I can't help but feel -this- is the more striking love-story, no matter how honestly heterosexual the warrior boy may be. This is the archetypal relationship between Hero and Shadow, and to me, nothing could really equal it in meaning or intensity, since it represents the basic union of Light and Dark of everyone's nature.
It occurred to me that the reason I'm so very fascinated strikes to the very heart of the reason of why I slash, why close male friendship means so much to me-- and the emotional stuntedness and closed-in inability of the latter boy to communicate his real self sort of underlines the 'normal' situation. It's almost like-- almost like -all- boys are a little sociopathic compared to ourselves (the girls, I mean); it's like they're often this closed in and verbally eloquent about everything but what lies in their hearts, so scared and insecure and ruthless in their defensiveness.
It also reminded me of the exchange I recently had with
I was thinking (with some chagrin), of how friends normally tend to make you uncomplicatedly happy, especially female friends (in my experience). If a friend isn't monumentally messed up, your relationship isn't likely to be fraught or angsty in terms of betrayals and secrets and overall tragedy, though clearly misunderstandings and resentments are normal. Uh, this is all 'in my experience'. And so, perhaps this is only the life of a relatively tame, easy-going female like myself-- men are much more likely to hold things back, to be eaten up by ambition and divided loyalties and duties, to be rotted from the inside with feelings they simply -can't- express, to be-- emotional basketcases, basically. And of course... of course, that's why I love them.
More to the point, that's why I love to slash them, leaving aside the hot boysex for a sec.
I can't really imagine a healthy relationship here, and can't guarantee this rift in the boy's soul can be mended with the love and faith another clueless boy can offer, but oh-- oh-- the very idea. The possibility. It is like the dream of somehow bridging the gulf between Self and Other; more desperate and dark than any mere love-story, but also more painfully close to the heart, perhaps.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 08:08 am (UTC)...But no, I jest :>
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 09:24 am (UTC)Okay, so that was prolly TMI. But sometimes I look at boys and can see that they're just like me: they really don't know if they're saying the right thing, they don't come armed with a foolproof plan, they're really just winging it. Winging everything.
And other times they call all the shots, because I let them. One thing you can't change is how other people feel (unfortunately). Am determined to get a better grip of my own feelings, though.
And this is your new facet! Reena, the Confessional Box. Eep. (Or EEPS, as the ukes ALWAYS say in yaoi.)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 09:38 am (UTC)I'm also an intense person, haha, and so I know where you're coming from. I feel I -should- be more of a 'loose woman' (easier that way, too!), and I theoretically know the Mr/Mrs Right thing is highly unlikely if not ridiculous, but. I yam what I yam, and so on and so forth. I don't think it was TMI (or is unless we mention *actual* bodily functions and not just 'squirming' in a metaphorical way, ahahaha. And even then, depends on what-- snot is okay... er.....)
I know what you mean about knowing not helping 'feeling'. That's like, my constant doom, because I know a lot but uh, my feelings aren't much progressed since I was 16. But boys really are winging it even moreso than we are, y'know, 'cause they're DUMBER, yes DUMBER :D :D *feels unjustly satisfied*
I've totally been used (USED I SAY) as the Confessional Box rather frequently. Even by boys. I dunno what it is, I think it's Eau de Reena. Or possibly everyone thinks I'm a sucker :D :D
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 11:12 am (UTC)Pornip?
TMI in the sense that I can yabber on for three days about myself and not say more than three actual things. What wrecks my head is having to wait -- wait for the right person, wait until the boys I know grow up, wait till he breaks up with her, wait till he sees that I'm just bloody wonderful damnit.
And I'm extremely IMPATIENT. I do not LIKE waiting.
I worry a lot that boys never want the same things as girls, that it's doomed to the perennial conflict between the hunter-gatherer and the cave-maker. Or whatever the hell. It's been proven scientifically and whatever. It makes me sad and also desirous of buying one of those long-stitch cushion cover sewing things so I can be ahead of the game when my life turns into Never Been Kissed except without the Kissing.
Yet they still seem to get what they want all the time, whereas girls are left in the dust going "Why didn't he call? Why'd he say that? Why'd he ignore me?" ETC ETC ETC.
Yup, you're a sucker.
No, I always seem to ... know who'll take me blabbering like this and who'd cosh me over the head for it. If it's any consolation, you're one of four people, one of whom gave birth to me. Perhaps that's actually an insult, I DO NOT KNOW.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 08:23 pm (UTC)I think -some- boys (not a lot) want the same things as girls, but they tend to be either repressed or geeky. Personally, I go for repressed, because geeky/emotional is just too easy, and I likes me a challenge. But there -are- boys who're waiting for The Right One and they just don't know it-- however, this is The Great Female Myth, so there are people who'd laugh at this, but! It's just that most girls don't apply this discriminately enough, and use wishful thinking rather than careful analysis (by which I mean, get 'em drunk and get 'em talkin', ahahah).
...I try to imagine bashing anyone over the head, like, ever and fail :( On the bright side(?), once I lose, I'm more likely to kill you than thwap you or be mean. But uh, I haven't lost it that much yet (isn't that just REASSURING, ahahah? Yes, yes it is.)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 08:27 pm (UTC)Yeah, the cats and Celine Dion, that's it.
To be fair, I do have some boys that I could loosely call friends, which is an improvement for me. Mind, the only reason I ever spoke to the most gorgey one is because he's got a girlfriend.
Same here. I'm soooo pleasant to everyone. And then one day, I'm sure, I'll take my flatmates out individually and kill them one by one.
(That's actually a Maeve Binchy quote, btw. She is love.)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 08:46 pm (UTC).......and then there's the ugly assholes :))
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 08:48 pm (UTC)And next on Station Emo ...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 08:52 pm (UTC)It's sort of like-- you find your target, right-- or at least, someone who doesn't freak you out & seems bearably attractive-- and you sort of... talk to him. And if that doesn't work (because it probably wouldn't with me!), you sort... well, I was gonna say stalk, but... occupy his space :))
...Okay, I'm just bullshitting, really, but you could always sort of pick out boys without ever doing anything, and then waiting for the moment to... inobtrusively move closer to their line of sight :D
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 09:05 pm (UTC)Hugging them whilst drunk tends to get your arse felt up, but that's Irish boys for you.
I'm tending towards the 'boys smell!' mindset right at the mo ...
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 09:09 pm (UTC)...Man, I've never met geeks in denial before. *is fascinated in spite of herself*
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 09:14 pm (UTC)Warl, they're swots more that geeks, I guess. They have not reconciled themselves to the fact and swots = social death where I come from. Given that they're in med, they have a helluva lot to be in denial about.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 09:23 pm (UTC)