reenka: (weasley's rule)
[personal profile] reenka
Ahhhhh, omg, omg!!

Duuuude!!


I've been so lazy and I haven't seen the last 5 eps of QAF and I finally downloaded and watched the first one, and omg, I'd forgotten how much I loved it!! Dude!! The only disturbing-icky part was the Ben/Michael sex, because... no. But! OMG the... *gurgle*... yes, okay, the Brian/Justin, okay I admit it, ack. Brian kissed him! On! The! Cheek!...!.. (he is so in love it is almost painful... except NOT)!! Aaaah! And! Said all sorts of! Romantic! Things! ...like... well... Justin was the one with the romantic things to say ("it was love to me" = GUH), but then Brian just sort of melted and I think I was squealing. Loudly. In my head. (I feel... junior high-schoolish and yet....) They are so... the... cutest evar!!1

And the dialogue is. Jumping! Was it always like that? They're all so adorable. Even Michael(!?... wtf? cute bonding with Hunter!) And... aww, Ted & Emmett make me sad. But not too sad, because Brian makes me happy, oh-so-happy, wah.

It's amazing how much Brian has really changed-- become more balanced... it's almost like he -glows- or something (or maybe he always did-- I mean, this -is- Brian). It's like... he's really showing affection so much more, and he seems... on top of things, except in a good way, but not an over-the-top compensating sort of way. Seriously, how can anyone not love him? He shines.

Yes, I'm a Brian whore. Wahah, I admit it! I mean, I was always saying "...but Justin!!" and now... I've seen the smirk light. *cough/swoon* I mean, I was just perving over pics of ickle Dan earlier today, and feeling awful (because! I'm not like that! HONEST!!) and... yeah, okay, now it's like, Dan who? Because. The pretty! Has! Landed! And! IT IS GAY!!!1 (..... fine, no need to bring "reality" into this, is there? Is there?)

EDIT - um. clearly... I spoke too soon. *gurgles & DIES!!1*
~~

And... I was also thinking about... stuff (again).

Like... do we choose who we become?

I know, it's kind of a biggie, but. I'm obsessed with it, in my own little way.

I think that's one of the things that confuse people about some stuff I say, because I think most people assume we just deal with the cards we're dealt in terms of our drives and needs and attitudes, right? And I think my unspoken assumption sometimes is that in the end, it's not a question of either nature -or- nurture, but of the choices we can make to overcome both those things. It's like... everyone has a range of potential no one can guess at, lurking within them, and it's a question of whether or not one chooses-- and believes that they're capable of choosing-- to become their better self. Choosing one's own best destiny.

So... looking at it that way... one can always at least strive to become smarter, stronger, fitter in whatever way. Or one can choose to pander to one's perceived flaws and admit defeat without much of a fight-- let the proof be in the pudding, so to speak. One can say "this is who I am", end of story, refusing to admit that identity is malleable and the future, unlike the past, is in our hands.

That's JKR's overall point, isn't it?


That's supposed to be the main difference between Harry and Draco, isn't it? That Harry chose not to accept the situations handed to him, that Harry has to learn to choose what he wants and believes in even in the face of a prophecy that is supposedly going to determine the future. What do you want to bet Harry's going to somehow subvert that prophecy, btw?

It really seems like Harry's discovery of free will is at the center of his journey.

I do believe it, I guess, so it's hypocritical to pose it as a question-- I do believe we may not choose who we are, but we can all choose who we become, and that's the important part. Maybe it's all an illusion and our lives and genetics shape us irrevocably, but without that illusion of "free will", what's worth fighting for? If our identities aren't our own in some way, if we are slaves to our pasts and our blood, where's our real identity, in the first place? Who are we if not that spark of "I will!" or "I won't!" that can define our varying potentials into a single point of belief?

(And by this measure, I really do think that Snape is a real hero in his own way, clearly. Not because he joined the "good side" or whatever, but because he chose to overcome-- while clearly retaining whatever he thought he was, at least at the surface. Neville & Ginny, ditto-- but Snape had a lot more to overcome. After all, he probably despised most of the people he was now 'joining'-- they tormented him and probably drove him to being a Death Eater in the first place! But evidently, he chose to say 'fuck them!' in the best way possible-- by living his life regardless, even though he's still pretty bitter and obsessed with the past. It's like, he only overcame just enough, but not enough to fully free himself by far.)

Perhaps that's it-- perhaps it doesn't matter whether we -can- shape our future and thus ourselves-- perhaps all that matters is that we -believe- and that faith in itself defines us. That in itself, is a fight against a self-fulfilling prophecy of a sort-- the prophecy that was given to each of us at birth-- we are where we are and when we are. Our intelligence molded by our parents and our schooling, our independence molded by the freedoms allowed to us, and our friendships and loves drawn from whoever gets to us first.

It's true that most people do live like that-- but I wouldn't say it's a sign of our intrinsic weak nature, of the necessity of it. Most people wouldn't even believe they could choose if someone told them. It seems so obvious, doesn't it? This is our lives, and what else can we do but live them? How can one imagine being outside of everything one knows, and remain oneself?

Is it possible, then, for Draco to one day realize that it's a good thing Harry Potter didn't take his hand that day? Is it possible for him to realize that Harry chose his future rather than surrendering to one he didn't want because it was the one first presented to him, just as he, Draco, could choose his?

In the books, of course, he won't-- because he's the contrast, isn't he-- he's the one who accepts the illusion of his past defining him. And yet, that's why I refuse to see him as weak-- as fated to be who he is and go down the predictable path-- that's how I want to redeem him. Even if in the books, he's not free, I want to make him free. And once that happens, the weakness, the whole issue of being in Harry's shadow, unnoticed, unloved-- it disappears. He won't need Harry or his father to love him or notice him. He may want that still, but he won't need it. He will have learned who he is, apart from others, apart from his past. Just him, Draco.

Still Malfoy, still everything he'd always been, but also different-- like a fractal that had mutated once, twice, and then a million times.

Alone, maybe-- but more importantly, a separate individual-- just Draco.

Outside of Harry's story, which had so long defined him: in his own story now.

And if he wants, he could then meet 'just Harry', or he could leave him to live his own life without needing to even say that he understands now. He won't be trapped in a codependent relationship where his needs are provided for by someone else and his holes plugged by a mix of illusion and fear and need and his future defined by someone else's vision. Because clearly, Harry has his own vision of how things "should" be and if Draco doesn't have an equally vivid one of his own, he'd always be in check.

Brian Kinney was right, though-- the best revenge is living a good life-- the life you want; otherwise you'd always be victimized by those who once hurt you or dominated your will. (And I suppose that's going to be poor Justin's lesson in life this season-- good thing he has Counselor Brian, heheh.) Checkmate, Harry Potter.

Now, maybe it's Harry who won't understand, though I hope he will, by the end.

We can all be heroes, isn't that the point? Even Brian Kinney-- or especially Brian Kinney, Selfish Bastard and clearly Slytherin extraordinaire, right? Even if just for a day. Any day we choose to be. Free to will.

Re: *disagrees*

Date: 2004-05-26 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
The problem with me, probably, is that I find discussion of possible past canon kinda... fruitless, since things happened the way they happeend for a reason (unlike 'real life', where that's debateable-- in a decent story, it's not). So... events have meaning, have weight beyond the obvious sum of coincindences and such that superficially "made" them happen. It's like, especially with such an important decision as whether Harry's in Slytherin-- which is actually central to the whole series-- it strikes me as almost funny that so many people think that one could change that without changing -everything-, including the fact of some major characters surviving. Including Harry. A better question would be, what -wouldn't- have been different. Probably, yes, Snape would still hate Harry :>

I know a lot of people have this kink for Harry-in-Slytherin stories, and while I don't have a specific 'Issue' with them, they just kinda make me sad. It's clear that Harry's Slytherin side isn't exactly a reflection of his best qualities-- basically, a lot of it's "influence" from Voldemort (like Parseltongue or whatever)-- clearly, his genetics and moral disposition place him squarely in Gryffindor. It's like the people who seriously think he's one foot in Slytherin -want- him to have embraced the Voldemort within him. Okay, maybe I'm overdoing it, but still. Harry's no run-of-the-mill Slytherin, y'know. If he wasn't going to save the wizarding world, he could very well have become the next great Dark Wizard.

I vacillate between liking Draco and agreeing with Harry that he's a stupid prick and knowing I'd never make friends with him, heheh. That's the pitfall of writing both their pov's, heheh. They just kinda cancel each other out in my head, I guess. In general, I think that Draco's seemingly different with different people, and the one thing I'm clear on is that Harry & Draco don't mix well. I mean... er... unless you add hormones ;))

I like anti-heroes or heroes, depending on the text of the story & how good it is. I'd never actually thought that made me 'simple', just lazy :D I rarely like all-out villains just because... they're so... unrealistic. In real life, people are just psychotic, not evil. :>

People cling to straws, as far as the pov-as-excuse thing, I think. A lot of people just don't like Harry (...yeah) and -need- a way to reinterpret the books to enjoy them. Why do they like them in the first place... you got me. The -only- reason I love the books, really, is because I love Harry-- everything else follows, but without that there'd be -nothing-. That's just me, of course.

I really really dislike the Draco-is-mean-because-of-Harry or "because of", period. Too many bad, scarring H/D fics, what can I say.

Also, another problem people have is that JKR's portrayal of Slytherins & Draco & 'villain' type people is pretty two-dimensional and unrealistic, however "canon", so they desperately look for loop-holes 'cause they do like the books in general. Or something. Me, I don't care. I'm zen about the books & the bad characterizations or whatever, since I used to HATE the books with a fiery passion. Now, I just coast along cooing 'cause I love Harry and everyone else can go to hell. Except Ron, 'cause dude. Ron <3

Profile

reenka: (Default)
reenka

October 2007

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
1415161718 19 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 01:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios