~~ bad writers untie! :D
Sep. 4th, 2003 07:53 pmha. to me it doesn't matter how harry & draco's get butchered as long as -i- see them in a certain way, as long as -i- exist; i would be a fandom of one. i would have jumped ship AGES ago if i was just saying "well how in-character does the fic get", because it doesn't. yes, we all know that in-character h/d fic doesn't really exist if you're picky about it. doesn't take very long to figure that out, man. there's some -great writing- in this pairing, some of the -best- writing, some of the most passionate writing. plus i adore them and the possibility of what they could be.
i think most people aren't -in- "the ship" as far as "the h/d fandom" very much unless they're newbies or really obsessively passionate (ie, they're the writers, not the readers, usually). either that, or people stay for certain particular wip's that keep their faith alive or something. but really, the majority of h/d fans seem to be... not very discriminating. a lot of the discriminating writers had their major productive periods more than a year ago, before ootp and maybe during and right after gof. right now-- it's mostly the newbies. it's not about being in-character and brilliantly rendered and really believable. i mean, if you want canon-believable, for most people that doesn't equal enemy-slash. well, usually.
i guess that while i find getting bored of monotony a reasonable explanation for not reading a certain pairing anymore, the whole "none of it is good" doesn't really seem to work. the majority of everything is pretty much crap anyway. i mean, how can you even justify having high expectations? in fact, the writing in -every- pairing, the fact that brilliant writing -exists- in the first place, already more than justifies and fulfills my expectations. sure, it would be -great- if fic existed that satisfied the canonists and the redemptionists and the smut-fiends and the believable-build-up people all at once-- but the more specific your desires, the more the answer becomes: write it yourself.
people write what they want to write, and partly what they want to read. if no stringently in-character h/d fic exists, this means the demand is low, since even amidst all the piles of crap, the talent is nevertheless high. i guess it's just vaguely surprising that one would seriously -expect- certain things from the fics. i mean, i get upset at bad characterization all the time, but i only get upset because i see so much potential, because i still -want- and need to basically see what amounts to my own vision. and if your own vision is what you need, and you don't share or agree with the majority, then you probably have always known that (well, i have).
might as well be yet another bad writer than a continuously disenfranchised and dissatisfied good reader, i would say.~:)
~~
also. cc's `a lot to be upset about' is the best thing since sliced bread. it is also draco/ginny. muwahahaha. with a side of comedic!draco/snape, which i -really- didn't think could be done. heeee. loveloveloveloveit. want to slash it, except not. i ship non-slashed h+d, eheheh :D
no subject
Date: 2003-09-04 09:41 pm (UTC)but totally, if you write h/d, they become much more a part of you, so it's a different dynamic. i mean, if i get turned on -writing- a scene about harry & draco as well as -reading- it, that really messes with me weirdly, especially since most of the time i don't want them at all, i just want them with each other in a motherly, concerned "awww, i adore you both" sort of way. but then you write or read something intense and all the sweet love goes out the window and you can't help but identify with one or the other or both, just because one does that when one reads or writes. and this is a tangent, but er... yeah.
i am totally with you (surprise!) on not always really judging based on in-characterness (all you have to do is see my list of favorite fics and you'd see plenty of rather ooc stuff that i felt was interestingly written and characterized, so i loved it). i'm rather drawn into a really interesting fic to the point where i forget about my theoretical issues, usually, unless the bad writing quality or the poor basic plausibility forces me to remember. i mean, most of the most awful characterization errors, i've always thought, are basically bad characterization choices for -any- semi-believable human being. but yeah, canon characterization is clearly far from my main gig 'cause i mean, i started from fanon, so. ahahah. *coughs*
and yeah, i know what you mean about it being the high point. *gleeful* heeeeee! i feel a bit of slightly sadistic glee at my inner!draco, 'cause that means he'd begun to crack, dear boy.
CRACK, draco, CRACK!! *giggles*