reenka: (Default)
[personal profile] reenka
i think the goal of reading, much as i write about it and think about it and ponder its highways and byways, is really, to me, for it to leave me speechless. not even so much overcome emotionally, though that's in there too. just-- unable to talk for the sudden new space inside me, somehow painfully open and vulnerable and -alive-.

that is the source of reading as a semi-mystical experience, when it goes beyond words, when it is so real that it transcends its own medium and lives inside you, as primary and vivid as any emotion you might otherwise have. very few pieces of writing achieve this. it is a whole new level-- it is the -ultimate- level of reader involvement, of the full transmission of intent, of the -creation- of the story inside you, the birth of meaning.

all the stories i remember most readily, most immediately, have had this effect on me, one i cannot, in the end, completely ascribe to the grace of the style or the fittingness of the jokes. it's a magic. it's the magic of storytelling. it is what i worship and wish to practice for the rest of my life. the only magic i have at my disposal, in potential even.

so. i'm reading cassie claire's `a season in hell'. and it's almost laughable for me to review it. i can no more do so (right now, anyway), than i could've reviewed `a brief interval' or aja's 9-11 fic or penguin's `falling', at first reading.
EDIT - er. that is to say.

it's simply that good.
ahem :D i did write an actual semi-detailed review. yes, aren't i a smart cookie ><;;

anyway.
alright. let's try this again. *meeps*
obviously i suck at making any sense. but that's alright, other people make sense, i can just sort of-- sit here, and read. it's all good.

the goal, as i see it, is to be so sold by something, so -there-, that you can't-- separate very easily. you can't see it from the outside, because you are just lost in the story, and initially, at least, it just gets a purely emotional reaction. everything seems to sound -right- and to -fit- and to feel -real-.

nothing jangles, and nothing breaks the flow, and it just all comes together and breathes. so um.
    yah. i'm a t00b.
    i meant, it's laughable to dissect it and say, ok, well that sentence worked really well, and this particular one didn't, and i really like the imagery with this, or that, and this bit was funny-- ok, i can do that, it just seems to miss the point, somehow, to be grinch-like. i mean, those people who instead of just -enjoying- things, feel they need to -analyze- them, and i'm not really one of those people. when something is just-- really enjoyable and beautiful, i'd rather just-- let it hit me. let it wash over me. analysis and thinking and stuff create a -distance- between you and the work, that's what i meant.

and sometimes distance isn't really possible, at least initially. or desireable. *clings to fic*
    right. so i guess i liked it, then. ><;;

it just creates that space in me-- hollow, slightly raw. i feel scraped, even though i was laughing out loud every half a minute.

i remember, suddenly, how i felt after reading chapter 10.
    why my little ficlet for that is the thing that has the most emotional meaning to me, out of all my fanfic, still.
    i wrote it from that raw, empty space. i wrote it because it tore itself from me. it wasn't an exercise, a meditation, an idea, a vision. it was pure emotion.

i used to write a lot of poetry from that space. i became very familiar with it, with the howling wind and the cold, and the heady sense of falling, flying, living.
    i dunno. that's why i like IP, btw. it works for me, it communicates emotion. that is what it's about, to me-- capturing it, communicating it, suggesting it. people tell me that my better writing is especially saturated with it. i've even been told i write stories -about- emotion. and really, what other kind of story is there, to write?

that's what really brings me across. i may be desperate for fluff, because i want to feel good. but really, i just want to feel. and if what i read is strong enough, my defenses crumble-- and that's what they are, defenses, i don't let myself open up to pain easily-- and i am -there-. it is so intense. no filters, no blinkers no, no way to escape the imagery filling your mind. the story just gets told to you, and you live it. you just-- live it. it lives.

Date: 2002-11-29 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thegraybook.livejournal.com

so. i'm reading cassie claire's `a season in hell'. and it's almost laughable for me to review it.

No love for cassie.

woe.

Date: 2002-11-29 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
eek~! i meant-- um. *blushes*
i meant it's so good i'm speechless.
that's why i was waxing poetic about well--
the point of stories, and so on ^^;;

much loff for cassie~! wah.
was going to actually come up with something concrete, once it's settled~:)

*meeping*
~reena

Date: 2002-11-29 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nefeleo.livejournal.com
I took it as a v. positive review, even in its earlier incarnation. you weren't incoherent, just a little rambly. :)

Date: 2002-11-29 09:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
thanks, i needed that :D
*feels less insane now*~:)

Date: 2002-11-29 10:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nefeleo.livejournal.com
The main thing I got out of what you said was that you loved fics that made you feel. I completely understand that perspective, it's why I love rhoddlet's work so much - it makes me all achey when I read it. It doesn't make me happy, it doesn't feel good, but it does singe my nerve endings and give a sort of transcendant lift. It hurts, but in a pleasurable way - like a sore muscle. A Season In Hell was like that too, though tempered by jokes and such, and therefore a little less painful. Still v. powerful though. :)

...erm. Sorry to get so wordy on you.

Date: 2002-11-29 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yourpoison.livejournal.com
*nods vigorously* like a sore muscle.
yah, exactly~:)
though-- humor tends to bring out the contrast, and make it more subtle, more cutting... well, it can, anyway.
and yah, i know what you mean about rhoddlet. and penelope, also.
....maybe cassie was um... teasing me ><
*crosses fingers*
this whole `reena-doesn't-like-cassie's-work' is like this evil meme that keeps hanging around my head like some blood-thirsty bee... ><;;
hee~:)

Date: 2002-11-29 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nefeleo.livejournal.com
aw. <:) there is little worse than being unclear or misinterpreted in a culture that is almost entirely text-based. :) it's impossible to use honest facial expressions or hand gestures to clarify. i am sure she will come back and reread for clarification, if she wasn't just teasing you. <:)

You took the words right outta my mouth.

Date: 2002-11-30 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] metro99.livejournal.com
I totally know what you mean about being left speechless. To me, something can be well-written, but it doesn't always mean it's good. The primary thing I look for is whether what I've read leaves me feeling something. And when that happens, I turn incoherent. When I try to rec it to someone, I can't really express what I liked so much about it and people just end up sidling away from me. -.-

But yes.

Profile

reenka: (Default)
reenka

October 2007

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
1415161718 19 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 04:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios