~~when good stories go bad.
Aug. 23rd, 2002 01:26 pmsomeone's rewritten `little red riding hood' again. um. this article about it makes me question whether to ever touch an english mythology/folklore class with a thirty-foot pole, ever again.
``Such tales are now routinely seen as allegories about social rules and transgressions, crime and punishment. They are read as Freudian texts about the relationship between men and women and as Jungian coming-of-age parables, tracing a familiar path that takes the hero or heroine from home, through a transformative experience (often in the forest or a faraway land) and home again, endowed with new wisdom or status."
doesn't that just make it sound like the most boring thing since adam sandler's last movie?? just shoot me if i ever even come close to spouting stuff like that. because i may as well have been taken over by the brain-eating zombies that academics apparently are.
do i think that analyzing & deconstructing fairy-tales (or stories in general) makes them weaker and lamer? well....
no. of course not.
but if you do it without passion, without love for the storyness of the story-- my god. it's like a root canal. what's so magical about ``allegories about social rules and transgressions"?? ergh. i think i hate the word allegory, anyway. it's so... so... unmagical. implies all sorts of icky moralistic things. the very idea! morals in stories. *looks sick* i'm rethinking this whole english major thing (and i haven't even ever seriously considered it-- well, not really....)
P.S. ~~amy lowell writes poetry that feels like silk on my skin. silk and moonlight. *smiles*
greatpoets is a good thing, after all.
P.P.S. ~~one more reason why
ztrin is frightening, she's so good-- kabuki! harry potter! kabuki! aack~:)
``Such tales are now routinely seen as allegories about social rules and transgressions, crime and punishment. They are read as Freudian texts about the relationship between men and women and as Jungian coming-of-age parables, tracing a familiar path that takes the hero or heroine from home, through a transformative experience (often in the forest or a faraway land) and home again, endowed with new wisdom or status."
doesn't that just make it sound like the most boring thing since adam sandler's last movie?? just shoot me if i ever even come close to spouting stuff like that. because i may as well have been taken over by the brain-eating zombies that academics apparently are.
do i think that analyzing & deconstructing fairy-tales (or stories in general) makes them weaker and lamer? well....
no. of course not.
but if you do it without passion, without love for the storyness of the story-- my god. it's like a root canal. what's so magical about ``allegories about social rules and transgressions"?? ergh. i think i hate the word allegory, anyway. it's so... so... unmagical. implies all sorts of icky moralistic things. the very idea! morals in stories. *looks sick* i'm rethinking this whole english major thing (and i haven't even ever seriously considered it-- well, not really....)
P.S. ~~amy lowell writes poetry that feels like silk on my skin. silk and moonlight. *smiles*
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
P.P.S. ~~one more reason why
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)