Date: 2007-06-02 10:33 pm (UTC)
Er, I had a response to that last bit written out but then it... went *poof*, so ^^;;
Suffice it to say that I agree, and that this reminds me of the usual portrait of repressed American suburbia, where everyone thinks what's important is the face you put on and the things you do in public, etc, and even if you've got severed fingers in little jars in the basement at home, everything's fine if you those fingers either aren't Mary's or John's from down the street or alternatively no one knows and the party goes on as planned.

I guess I don't really think of having a Super-ego as something to congratulate someone over? So yeay, you don't go out and kill/rape/pillage, yeah, repression and fear of consequences and civilization in general has done its job? Er? I used to have arguments about the value of actions (as 'reality') vs. feelings/thoughts (as 'reality') often, and people... well, I think they may honestly think that their inner world is 120% less real and significant than the world of what they ate for breakfast and where they went last Sunday, and in fact that's what 'reality' is, just as 'normalcy' is merely resembling the Joneses enough to 'pass'. I don't even think you can call it a 'lie' because it's such a culturally accepted and deeply rooted belief, one that they build entire social orders on. They bring out the 'fiction/desires are dangerous! oppress now!!' thing when people get a little too much religion (and guilt), but basically Western society functions through repression of the individual Id and its subsequent sublimation into 'acceptable' venues.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

reenka: (Default)
reenka

October 2007

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78910111213
1415161718 19 20
21222324252627
28293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 08:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios